The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Battery Model and State-of-Health Determination Through Subspace Parameter Estimation and State-Observer Techniques
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes a novel adaptive battery model based on a remapped variant of the well-known Randles' lead-acid model. Remapping of the model is shown to allow improved modeling capabilities and accurate estimates of dynamic circuit parameters when used with subspace parameter-estimation techniques. The performance of the proposed methodology is demonstrated by application to batteries for an all-electric personal rapid transit vehicle from the urban light transport (ULTRA) program, which is designated for use at Heathrow Airport, U.K. The advantages of the proposed model over the Randles' circuit are demonstrated by comparisons with alternative observer/estimator techniques, such as the basic Utkin observer and the Kalman estimator. These techniques correctly identify and converge on voltages associated with the battery state-of-charge (SoC), despite erroneous initial conditions, thereby overcoming problems attributed to SoC drift (incurred by Coulomb-counting methods due to overcharging or ambient temperature fluctuations). Observation of these voltages, as well as online monitoring of the degradation of the estimated dynamic model parameters, allows battery aging (state-of-health) to also be assessed and, thereby, cell failure to be predicted. Due to the adaptive nature of the proposed algorithms, the techniques are suitable for applications over a wide range of operating environments, including large ambient temperature variations. Moreover, alternative battery topologies may also be accommodated by the automatic adjustment of the underlying state-space models used in both the parameter-estimation and observer/estimator stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Cited by
A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles
Lu, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J., & Ouyang, M. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 · Cited by 4,837
Waag, W., Fleischer, C., & Sauer, D. U. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064 · Cited by 1,059
Predicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven machine learning
Ng, M.-F., Zhao, J., Yan, Q., Conduit, G. J., & Seh, Z. W. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0156-7 · Cited by 793
Shrivastava, P., Soon, T. K., Idris, M. Y. I. B., & Mekhilef, S. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.040 · Cited by 704
Nejad, S., Gladwin, D. T., & Stone, D. A. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.042 · Cited by 565
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, C. R., Bingham, C. M., Stone, D. A., & Bentley, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3905-3916
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W2102227895
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Battery Model and State-of-Health Determination Through Subspace Parameter Estimation and State-Observer Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2009.2028348
- The paper
- Gould, C. R., Bingham, C. M., Stone, D. A., & Bentley, P. (2009). New Battery Model and State-of-Health Determination Through Subspace Parameter Estimation and State-Observer Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2009.2028348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.