Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Part II: Hilly and Mountainous Settings

Sun, Ruoyu, Matolak, David W.·2017·IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Abstract

The use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is expanding rapidly. For safe and reliable integration of UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS), control and nonpayload communication (CNPC) system requirements are being developed. The air-to-ground (AG) channel characteristics essentially determine CNPC link performance. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center has sponsored a comprehensive AG channel measurement campaign in 2013 in both the Land C-bands recently allocated for UAS. These measurements covered nearly all typical ground site (GS) local environments, including over water, hilly, mountainous, suburb, and near urban. As a continuation of results reported for the over-water scenarios, a description of the measurement campaign, measured results, and complete AG channel models for hilly and mountainous terrains are provided in this paper. The path loss is modeled by a modified log-distance path loss model with a correction for flight direction; path loss results are close to those of free space. A strong ground reflection was observed only for some small portions of some of the flight paths. The small-scale fading is well modeled by the Ricean distribution with a K-factor of 29.4 dB in the C-band and 12.8 dB in the L-band. The interband signals are uncorrelated. The spatial correlation for the two intraband channels with an aircraft antenna separation of 1.8 m is greater than 0.85. The C-band root-mean-square delay spread (RMS-DS) is 10 ns most of the time, with a maximum of 1 μs in hilly terrain and 180 ns in mountainous terrain. Tapped delay line (TDL) models accounting for the line of sight (LOS) and up to seven intermittent multipath components (MPCs) were developed, including the MPCs' probability of occurrence, relative power, phase, duration, and excess delay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvt.2016.2585504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Sun, R., & Matolak, D. W.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
Published
2017-03
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
1913-1925
ISSN
  • 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9359
OpenAlex
W2475307529
Cited by
238
References
0
FWCI
13.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Part II: Hilly and Mountainous Settings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2016.2585504
The paper
Sun, R., & Matolak, D. W. (2017). Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Part II: Hilly and Mountainous Settings. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2016.2585504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.