The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remaining Useful Life Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using CNN-LSTM-DNN Hybrid Method
Abstract
The prediction of a Lithium-ion battery's lifetime is very important for ensuring safety and reliability. In addition, it is utilized as an early warning system to prevent the battery's failure. Recent advance in Machine Learning (ML) is an enabler for new data-driven estimation approaches. In this paper, we suggest a hybrid method, named the CNN-LSTM-DNN, which is a combination of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN), for the estimation of the battery's remaining useful life (RUL) and improving prediction accuracy with acceptable execution time. A comparison against various ML estimation algorithms is carried out to show the superiority of the proposed hybrid estimation approach. For that, three statistical indicators, i.e., the MAE, R2, and RMSE, are selected to assess numerically the prediction results. Experimental validation is performed using two datasets of different lithium-ion batteries from NASA and CALCE. Thus, results reveal that hybrid methods perform better than the single ones, also the effectiveness of the suggested method in reducing the prediction error and in achieving better RUL prediction performance compared to the other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
Sainath, T. N., Vinyals, O., Senior, A., & Sak, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178838 · Cited by 1,678
Li, X., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Dong, P. (2019) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2018.12.011 · Cited by 445
LSTM-Based battery remaining useful life prediction with multi-channel charging profiles
Park, K., Choi, Y., Choi, W. J., Ryu, H.-Y., & Kim, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2968939 · Cited by 397
Lithium-Ion Battery Prognostics with Hybrid Gaussian Process Function Regression
Peng, Y., Hou, Y., Song, Y., Pang, J., & Liu, D. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11061420 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Wang, S., Wu, F., Takyi-Aninakwa, P., Fernandez, C., Stroe, D.-I., & Huang, Q. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128677 · Cited by 281
Aging mechanisms, prognostics and management for lithium-ion batteries: Recent advances
Wang, Y., Xiang, H., Soo, Y.-Y., & Fan, X. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114915 · Cited by 142
Multivariate Stacked Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory for Lithium-Ion Battery Health Management
Ardeshiri, R. R., Liu, M., & Ma, C. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108481 · Cited by 94
Wang, X., Dai, K., Hu, M., & Ni, N. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.112442 · Cited by 72
Repurposing Second-Life EV Batteries to Advance Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Review
Akram, M. N., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2024) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries10120452 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Zraibi, B., Okar, C., Chaoui, H., & Mansouri, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4252-4261
- ISSN
- 0018-9545 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9359
- OpenAlex
- W3154061193
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining Useful Life Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using CNN-LSTM-DNN Hybrid Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tvt.2021.3071622
- The paper
- Zraibi, B., Okar, C., Chaoui, H., & Mansouri, M. (2021). Remaining Useful Life Assessment for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using CNN-LSTM-DNN Hybrid Method. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2021.3071622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.