The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Effectiveness of OTFS for Joint Radar Parameter Estimation and Communication
Abstract
We consider a joint radar parameter estimation and communication system using orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation. The scenario is motivated by vehicular applications where a vehicle (or the infrastructure) equipped with a mono-static radar wishes to communicate data to its target receiver, while estimating parameters of interest related to this receiver. Provided that the radar-equipped transmitter is ready to send data to its target receiver, this setting naturally assumes that the receiver has been already detected. In a point-to-point communication setting over multipath time-frequency selective channels, we study the joint radar and communication system from two perspectives, i.e., the radar parameter estimation at the transmitter as well as the data detection at the receiver. For the radar parameter estimation part, we derive an efficient approximated Maximum Likelihood algorithm and the corresponding Cramér-Rao lower bound for range and velocity estimation. Numerical examples demonstrate that multi-carrier digital formats such as OTFS can achieve as accurate radar estimation as state-of-the-art radar waveforms such as frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW). For the data detection part, we focus on separate detection and decoding and consider a soft-output detector that exploits efficiently the channel sparsity in the Doppler-delay domain. We quantify the detector performance in terms of its pragmatic capacity, i.e., the achievable rate of the channel induced by the signal constellation and the detector soft-output. Simulations show that the proposed scheme outperforms concurrent state-of-the-art solutions. Overall, our work shows that a suitable digitally modulated waveform enables to efficiently operate joint radar parameter estimation and communication by achieving full information rate of the modulation and near-optimal radar estimation performance. Furthermore, OTFS appears to be particularly suited to the scope.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Capacity of Multi‐antenna Gaussian Channels
Telatar, E. (1999) · European Transactions on Telecommunications · doi:10.1002/ett.4460100604 · Cited by 11,234
Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm
Kschischang, F. R., Frey, B. J., & Loeliger, H.-A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910572 · Cited by 6,486 · cited 3×
“Moreover, messages can be implemented in the logarithmic domain [37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding
Richardson, T. J., & Urbanke, R. L. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.910577 · Cited by 3,065
Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
Richards, M. A. (2005) · Cited by 2,807
In-Band Full-Duplex Wireless: Challenges and Opportunities
Sabharwal, A., Schniter, P., Guo, D., Bliss, D. W., Rangarajan, S., & Wichman, R. (2014) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2014.2330193 · Cited by 2,290
A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector
Robey, F. C., Fuhrmann, D. R., Kelly, E. J., & Nitzberg, R. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/7.135446 · Cited by 1,660
Sturm, C., & Wiesbeck, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2131110 · Cited by 1,459
Interference Cancellation and Iterative Detection for Orthogonal Time Frequency Space Modulation
Raviteja, P., Phan, K. T., Hong, Y., & Viterbo, E. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2860011 · Cited by 1,233
Automotive radars: A review of signal processing techniques
Patole, S. M., Torlak, M., Wang, D., & Ali, M. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2016.2628914 · Cited by 1,148
Vehicle-to-Everything (v2x) Services Supported by LTE-Based Systems and 5G
Chen, S., Hu, J., Shi, Y., Peng, Y., Fang, J., Zhao, R., & Zhao, L. (2017) · IEEE Communications Standards Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcomstd.2017.1700015 · Cited by 921
Cited by
Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond
Liu, F., Cui, Y., Masouros, C., Xu, J., Han, T. X., Eldar, Y. C., & Buzzi, S. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2022.3156632 · Cited by 3,857
Integrated Sensing and Communication Signals Toward 5G-A and 6G: A Survey
Wei, Z., Qu, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., Wu, H., Du, Y., Han, K., Zhang, N., & Feng, Z. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3235618 · Cited by 686
Joint Design of Communication and Sensing for Beyond 5G and 6G Systems
Wild, T., Braun, V., & Viswanathan, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3059488 · Cited by 508
Li, Z., Wang, P., Shen, Y., & Li, S. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25020302 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaudio, L., Kobayashi, M., Caire, G., & Colavolpe, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5951-5965
- ISSN
- 1536-1276 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2248
- OpenAlex
- W3033820925
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 28.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Effectiveness of OTFS for Joint Radar Parameter Estimation and Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/twc.2020.2998583
- The paper
- Gaudio, L., Kobayashi, M., Caire, G., & Colavolpe, G. (2020). On the Effectiveness of OTFS for Joint Radar Parameter Estimation and Communication. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2020.2998583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.