CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Media and PhilosophySociopolitical Dynamics in Russia

"Eternal Youth": the Ethics of an Ideological Alliance Between Youth and Artificial Intelligence

Artamonov, Denis S., Nevvazhay, Igor D., Suslov, Ivan V., Syusyukin, Vladimir A., Tikhonova, Sophia V.·2025·2025 IEEE Ural-Siberian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT)
DOI 10.1109/usbereit65494.2025.11054193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of axiological aspects of young people's interaction with digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) in the conditions of rapid digitalization of modern society. The authors emphasize that young people, being the main driver and beneficiary of technological innovations, face the need to form new moral and ethical models of using digital services and AI. The article analyzes socio-psychological characteristics of youth, such as increased interest in technology, propensity for quick ethical judgments and susceptibility to mythological narratives, which makes them a key subject in the process of AI adaptation in social life. The authors highlight both positive and negative aspects of young people's interaction with AI. On the one hand, AI has the potential to improve educational processes and increase research efficiency, but on the other hand, it raises concerns about digital dependency, decreased critical thinking, and emotional isolation. Special attention is paid to the phenomenon of "emotional bubbles", when AI companions create an illusion of emotional connection, which can negatively affect the ability to empathy and the formation of moral norms. The article proposes three basic principles of the ideology of interaction with AI: subject-centeredness, transparency and transhumanism. These principles are aimed at ensuring the ethical use of technology, where the human being remains the central subject and AI acts as a tool to i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/usbereit65494.2025.11054193

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using LLM-CBs for emotional regulation may hinder the development of adaptive emotion regulation skills.

    “Using LLM-CBs for emotional regulation may also hinder the development of adaptive emotion regulation skills.”

    From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Children and adolescents may miss out on navigating new social situations if LLM-CBs are preferred as social interaction partners.

    “Children and adolescents may miss out on navigating new social situations if LLM-CBs are preferred as social interaction partners.”

    From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

  • One article argued that excessive use of LLM-CBs may impact child and adolescent social and emotional development.

    “It has been argued by one article that excessive use of LLM-CBs may impact child and adolescent social and emotional development53: Children and adolescents may miss out on navigating new social situations if LLM-CBs are preferred as social interaction partners.”

    From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

  • One article argues that the use of LLM-CBs as cognitive tools may especially impact child and adolescent cognitive development due to being in more vulnerable stages of development.

    “One article argues that the use of LLM-CBs as cognitive tools may especially impact child and adolescent cognitive development due to being in more vulnerable stages of development53.”

    From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Social interactions with LLM-CBs do not represent human-to-human interactions, which may impair the development of social skills.

    “Furthermore, social interactions with LLM-CBs do not represent human-to-human interactions, which may impair the development of social skills.”

    From A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Artamonov, D. S., Nevvazhay, I. D., Suslov, I. V., Syusyukin, V. A., & Tikhonova, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Saratov State University (RU)
  • Saratov State Law Academy,Department of Philosophy,Saratov,Russia
ORCID
Venue
2025 IEEE Ural-Siberian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-05-12
Pages
312-316
DOI
10.1109/usbereit65494.2025.11054193
OpenAlex
W4411950405
Cited by
1
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Russian Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Keywords
AI ethics, digitalization, axiology, digital dependence, critical thinking, emotional isolation, AI companions, empathy, transhumanism, transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review