Cited by 391Morphological variations and asymmetry3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolutionary Morphing

Open access
Wiley, D.F., Amenta, N., Alcantara, D.A., Ghosh, D., Kil, Y.J., Delson, E., Harcourt-Smith, W., Rohlf, F.J., St. John, K., Hamann, B.·2006·VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005.

Abstract

We introduce a technique to visualize the gradual evolutionary change of the shapes of living things as a morph between known three-dimensional shapes. Given geometric computer models of anatomical shapes for some collection of specimens - here the skulls of the some of the extant members of a family of monkeys - an evolutionary tree for the group implies a hypothesis about the way in which the shape changed through time. We use a statistical model which expresses the value of some continuous variable at an internal point in the tree as a weighted average of the values at the leaves. The framework of geometric morphometrics can then be used to define a shape-space, based on the correspondences of landmark points on the surfaces, within which these weighted averages can be realized as actual surfaces. Our software provides tools for performing and visualizing such an analysis in three dimensions. Beginning with laser range scans of crania, we use our landmark editor to interactively place landmark points on the surface. We use these to compute a "tree-morph" that smoothly interpolates the shapes across the tree. Each intermediate shape in the morph is a linear combination of all of the input surfaces. We create a surface model for an intermediate shape by warping all the input meshes towards the correct shape and then blending them together. To do the blending, we compute a weighted average of their associated trivariate distance functions and then extract a surface from the resulting function. We implement this idea using the squared distance function, rather than the usual signed distance function, in a novel way.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/visual.2005.1532826

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-dimensional geometric morphometrics allows for the visualization of hypothetical phenotypes.

    “An advantage of high-dimensional geometric morphometrics is that it allows for the visualization of hypothetical phenotypes (34).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1145/965400.965504 · DOI
  2. 10.1364/JOSAA.4.000629 · DOI
  3. lerios, 1995, Feature-based volume meta-morphosis, In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, 449
  4. 10.1145/37401.37422 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/286013 · DOI
  6. mauch, 2003, Efficient Algorithms for Solving Static Hamilton-Jacobi Equations
  7. mauch, 2004, Closest point transform
  8. 10.1145/1186562.1015713 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/2945.928169 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S1361-8415(97)85012-8 · DOI
  11. delson, 2003, 3d visualization of inferred intermediates on a phylogenetic tree-applications in paleoanthropology (abstract), Amer J Phys Anthropol Suppl, 36, 86
  12. 10.1145/274363.274366 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/11250000409356545 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00731.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1145/1186562.1015812 · DOI
  16. subsol, 2002, 3d image processing for the study of the evolution of the shape of the human skull: presentation of the tools and preliminary results, Three-Dimensional Imaging in Paleoanthropology and Prehistoric Archaeology number 1049 in BAR International Series, 37
  17. 10.1145/311535.311580 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wiley, D. F., Amenta, N., Alcantara, D. A., Ghosh, D., Kil, Y. J., Delson, E., Harcourt-Smith, W., Rohlf, F. J., St. John, K., & Hamann, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2006-01-05
Pages
431-438
ISSN
1070-2385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294818775
Cited by
391
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Visualization (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9624034, 0093378, CAREER)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
shape evolution, geometric morphometrics, skull shape, phylogenetic tree, landmark placement, distance measures, shape space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review