Cited by 153Access Control and TrustIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A fuzzy approach to trust based access control in internet of things

Open access

Abstract

In the Internet of thing (IoT), the activities of daily life are supported by a multitude of heterogeneous, loosely coupled ubiquitous devices. Traditional access control model are not suitable to the nomadic, decentralized and dynamic scenarios in the IoT where identities are not known in advance. This makes the trust management in IoT more promising to address the access control issues .This paper present a Fuzzy approach to the Trust Based Access Control (FBAC) with the notion of trust levels for identity management. The presented fuzzy approach for trust calculations deals with the linguistic information of devices to address access control in the IoT. The simulation result shows that the fuzzy approach for trust based access control guarantees scalability ad it is energy efficient. This paper also proposes FTBAC framework or trust based dynamic access control in distributed IoT. FTBAC framework i a flexible and scalable a increasing number o devices do not affect the functioning and performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vitae.2013.6617083

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 153

Metadata

Authors
Mahalle, P. N., Thakre, P. A., Prasad, N. R., & Prasad, R.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
Venue
Wireless VITAE 2013
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W2038206765
Cited by
153
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
22.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Wireless Communications, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems (Wireless VITAE) (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
trust-based access control, Internet of Things, fuzzy logic, trust management, identity management, trust levels, linguistic information, dynamic access control, scalability, energy efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review