Cited by 9Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityCryptographic Implementations and SecurityRadiation Effects in Electronics

Robust True Random Number Generator using Stochastic Short-Term Recovery of Charge Trapping FinFET for Advanced Hardware Security

Yang, Jianguo, Ding, Qingting, Gong, Tiancheng, Luo, Qing, Xue, Xiaoyong, Gao, Zhaomeng, Yu, Haoran, Yu, Jie +7 more·2020·2020 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology

Abstract

In this work, we demonstrated a novel true random number generator (TRNG) utilizing stochastic short-term recovery of Charge- Trapping (CT) FinFET devices. The true random bits were generated by measuring the recovery time of CT-FinFET with a digital counter by a time-to-digital count converter (TDCC) unit. The resulting CT - TRNG circuit shows great immunity against a power noise of up to 600m V in amplitude and up to 1.5G Hz in frequency across a wide range of temperatures (-20 to 85°C). It passed all NIST 800-22 and NIST 800-90B randomness tests. We have shown this novel CT - TRNG to be the most promising high-reliability hardware security solution to date.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/vlsitechnology18217.2020.9265048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A MOSFET-based tRNG with 100% CMOS compatibility has been demonstrated for high scalability and applicability to an advanced foundry platform by using random telegraph noise or random charge trapping effects as an entropy source.

    “As an alternative to the circuit-based tRNGs, a MOSFET-based tRNG with 100% CMOS compatibility has been demonstrated for high scalability and applicability to an advanced foundry platform by using random telegraph noise or random charge trapping effects as an entropy source (24–26).”
  • The MOSFET-based tRNG's randomness is not fully verified, and high power consumption remains a problem in some cases.

    “However, its randomness is not fully verified, and high power consumption remains a problem in some cases.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Ding, Q., Gong, T., Luo, Q., Xue, X., Gao, Z., Yu, H., Yu, J., Xu, X., Yuan, P., Li, X., Tai, L., Chung, S. S., Lv, H., & Liu, M.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Venue
2020 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
1-2
OpenAlex
W3107283604
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Symposium on VLSI Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61834009,61904200,61821091)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
Keywords
true random number generator, short-term recovery, hardware security, temperature robustness, randomness testing, NIST SP 800-22, NIST SP 800-90B

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review