Cited by 30Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFace recognition and analysisSpeech and Audio Processing

Audio-Visual Face Reenactment

Open access
Agarwal, Madhav, Mukhopadhyay, Rudrabha, Namboodiri, Vinay, Jawahar, C V·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

This work proposes a novel method to generate realistic talking head videos using audio and visual streams. We animate a source image by transferring head motion from a driving video using a dense motion field generated using learnable keypoints. We improve the quality of lip sync using audio as an additional input, helping the network to attend to the mouth region. We use additional priors using face segmentation and face mesh to improve the structure of the reconstructed faces. Finally, we improve the visual quality of the generations by incorporating a carefully designed identity-aware generator module. The identity-aware generator takes the source image and the warped motion features as input to generate a high-quality output with fine-grained details. Our method produces state-of-the-art results and generalizes well to unseen faces, languages, and voices. We comprehensively evaluate our approach using multiple metrics and outperforming the current techniques both qualitative and quantitatively. Our work opens up several applications, including enabling low bandwidth video calls. We release a demo video and additional information at http://cvit.iiit.ac.in/research/projects/cvit-projects/avfr.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00515

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several face reenactment strategies including EAMM, AVFR-GAN, DiffTalk, ADNeRF and ATVGnet are not well suited for zero-shot lip-synced generation of unseen speakers.

    “We investigated several face reenactment strategies including EAMM [26], AVFR-GAN [2], DiffTalk [54], ADNeRF [20] and ATVGnet [10] and concluded that these methods are not well suited for zero-shot lip-synced generation of unseen speakers.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, M., Mukhopadhyay, R., Namboodiri, V., & Jawahar, C. V.
Affiliations
  • International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad (IN)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-01
Pages
5167-5176
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319301061
Cited by
28
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8
FWCI
2.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
talking head generation, lip synchronization, dense motion field, face segmentation, face mesh, audio-driven video generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review