The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generation of a new IDS test dataset: Time to retire the KDD collection
Abstract
Intrusion detection systems are generally tested using datasets compiled at the end of last century, justified by the need for publicly available test data and the lack of any other alternative datasets. Prominent amongst this legacy group is the KDD project. Whilst a seminal contribution at the time of compilation, these datasets no longer represent relevant architecture or contemporary attack protocols, and are beset by data corruptions and inconsistencies. Hence, testing of new IDS approaches against these datasets does not provide an effective performance metric, and contributes to erroneous efficacy claims. This paper introduces a new publicly available dataset which is representative of modern attack structure and methodology. The new dataset is contrasted with the legacy datasets, and the performance difference of commonly used intrusion detection algorithms is highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
“ADFA (University of New South Wales 2013): This dataset includes normal training and validating data and 10 attacks per vector (Creech and Hu, 2013).”
MethodMalware traffic classification using convolutional neural network for representation learning
Wang, W., Zhu, M., Zeng, X., Ye, X., & Sheng, Y. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) · doi:10.1109/icoin.2017.7899588 · Cited by 1,177
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
Artificial intelligence, cyber-threats and industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities
Bécue, A., Praça, I., & Gama, J. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09942-2 · Cited by 368
UNICORN: Runtime Provenance-Based Detector for Advanced Persistent Threats
Han, X., Pasquier, T., Bates, A., Mickens, J., & Seltzer, M. (2020) · Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2020.24046 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Creech, G., & Hu, J.
- Venue
- 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-04
- Pages
- 4487-4492
- ISSN
- 1525-3511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981738628
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generation of a new IDS test dataset: Time to retire the KDD collection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/wcnc.2013.6555301
- The paper
- Creech, G., & Hu, J. (2013). Generation of a new IDS test dataset: Time to retire the KDD collection. 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). https://doi.org/10.1109/wcnc.2013.6555301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.