Cited by 381Indoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

DeepFi: Deep learning for indoor fingerprinting using channel state information

Wang, Xuyu, Gao, Lingjun, Mao, Shiwen, Pandey, Santosh·2015·2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)

Abstract

With the fast growing demand of location-based services in indoor environments, indoor positioning based on fingerprinting has attracted a lot of interest due to its high accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel deep learning based indoor fingerprinting system using Channel State Information (CSI), which is termed DeepFi. Based on three hypotheses on CSI, the DeepFi system architecture includes an off-line training phase and an on-line localization phase. In the off-line training phase, deep learning is utilized to train all the weights as fingerprints. Moreover, a greedy learning algorithm is used to train all the weights layer-by-layer to reduce complexity. In the on-line localization phase, we use a probabilistic method based on the radial basis function to obtain the estimated location. Experimental results are presented to confirm that DeepFi can effectively reduce location error compared with three existing methods in two representative indoor environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wcnc.2015.7127718

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The running time per location for the SDNNLoc is almost the same as the DeepFi system, where both use the DNN based technique.

    “The running time per location for the SDNNLoc is almost the same as the DeepFi system, where both use the DNN based technique.”
  • The SDNNLoc system is more accurate than the other two, with fewer location errors.

    “The SDNNLoc system is more accurate than the other two, with fewer location errors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Gao, L., Mao, S., & Pandey, S.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Cisco Systems (United States) (US)
Venue
2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-03
Pages
1666-1671
ISSN
1525-3511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2240192984
Cited by
381
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
24.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
indoor positioning, channel state information, deep learning, greedy learning, radial basis functions, location-based services, location error reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review