The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian network-based trust model
Abstract
We propose a Bayesian network-based trust model. Since trust is multifaceted, even in the same context, agents still need to develop differentiated trust in different aspects of other agents' behaviors. The agent's needs are different in different situations. Depending on the situation, an agent may need to consider its trust in a specific aspect of another agent's capability or in a combination of multiple aspects. Bayesian networks provide a flexible method to present differentiated trust and combine different aspects of trust. A Bayesian network-based trust model is presented for a file sharing peer-to-peer application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system
Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2004) · Advances in Applied Microeconomics · doi:10.1016/s0278-0984(02)11030-3 · Cited by 1,804
Recommender systems in e-commerce
Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (1999) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Electronic commerce · doi:10.1145/336992.337035 · Cited by 1,684
Supporting trust in virtual communities
Abdul-Rahman, A., & Hailes, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926814 · Cited by 1,339
A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks
Heckerman, D. (1998) · Learning in Graphical Models · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-5014-9_11 · Cited by 1,220
Milojicic, D. S., Kalogeraki, V., Lukose, R. M., Nagaraja, K., Pruyne, J., Richard, B., Rollins, S., & Xu, Z. (2002) · Cited by 734
Abdul-Rahman, A., & Hailes, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the 1997 workshop on New security paradigms - NSPW '97 · doi:10.1145/283699.283739 · Cited by 699
REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies
Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2001) · Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents · doi:10.1145/375735.376110 · Cited by 492
A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities
Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45012-2_15 · Cited by 464
An evidential model of distributed reputation management
Yu, B., & Singh, M. P. (2002) · Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems part 1 - AAMAS '02 · doi:10.1145/544805.544809 · Cited by 449
REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies
Sabater, J., & Carles Sierra, A. (2001) · Cited by 382
Cited by
Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things
Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.105 · Cited by 508
Trust Management in Cloud Computing: A Critical Review
Firdhous, M., Ghazali, O., & Hassan, S. (2012) · International Journal on Advances in ICT for Emerging Regions (ICTer) · doi:10.4038/icter.v4i2.4674 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Vassileva, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003)
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2004-04-23
- Pages
- 372-378
- OpenAlex
- W2110966887
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 33.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian network-based trust model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/wi.2003.1241218
- The paper
- Wang, Y., & Vassileva, J. (2004). Bayesian network-based trust model. Proceedings IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/wi.2003.1241218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
