Cited by 245Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisBiometric Identification and Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behavior

Open access
Agarwal, Shruti, Farid, Hany, El-Gaaly, Tarek, Lim, Ser-Nam·2020·2020 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)

Abstract

Synthetically-generated audios and videos - so-called deep fakes - continue to capture the imagination of the computer-graphics and computer-vision communities. At the same time, the democratization of access to technology that can create a sophisticated manipulated video of anybody saying anything continues to be of concern because of its power to disrupt democratic elections, commit small to large-scale fraud, fuel disinformation campaigns, and create non-consensual pornography. We describe a biometric-based forensic technique for detecting face-swap deep fakes. This technique combines a static biometric based on facial recognition with a temporal, behavioral biometric based on facial expressions and head movements, where the behavioral embedding is learned using a CNN with a metric-learning objective function. We show the efficacy of this approach across several large-scale video datasets, as well as in-the-wild deep fakes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wifs49906.2020.9360904

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 245

Metadata

Authors
Agarwal, S., Farid, H., El-Gaaly, T., & Lim, S.-N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-12-06
Pages
1-6
ISSN
2157-4774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021589373
Cited by
242
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
deepfake detection, face recognition, facial expressions, head movement, behavioral biometrics, metric learning, disinformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review