Middleware for Internet of Things: A quantitative evaluation in small scale
Abstract
Recently, there have been a large number of proposals for IoT middleware solutions. In addition, a few recent studies have surveyed and qualitatively evaluated these IoT middleware proposals against functional and non-functional features. A quantitative evaluation is also needed to complement these existing qualitative studies and provide a more in-depth perspective of the state of the art. This paper presents a quantitative evaluation of 4 representative proposals: OpenIoT, CHOReOS, LinkSmart and UBIWARE. The evaluation results, based on a small real-life scenario, show that research is needed in the area of autonomous and scalable service registration, discovery and composition, heterogeneity, and interoperability of IoT middlewares.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hardware requirements of middleware in the IoT context can be a concern.
“However, hardware requirements of middleware in the IoT context can be a concern [28] [29] [30].”
From Edge Computing and Microservices Middleware for Home Energy Management Systems (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Computing and Microservices Middleware for Home Energy Management Systems
Ferreira, L. C. B. C., Borchardt, A. D. R., Cardoso, G. D. S., Mendes Lemes, D. A., Sousa, G. R. D. R. D., Neto, F. B., de Lima, E. R., Fraidenraich, G., Cardieri, P., & Meloni, L. G. P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3214229 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“IoT context can be a concern [28], [29], [30].”
Background
- Authors
- Palade, A., Cabrera, C., White, G., Razzaque, M. A., & Clarke, S.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2734495035
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) (publishedVersion)
- Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion)
- TeesRep (Teesside University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
- Keywords
- quantitative evaluation, service discovery, service composition, service registration, interoperability, heterogeneity, scalability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
