The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A structure for the yeast prohibitin complex: Structure prediction and evidence from chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
The mitochondrial prohibitin complex consists of two subunits (PHB1 of 32 kD and PHB2 of 34 kD), assembled into a membrane‐associated supercomplex of approximately 1 MD. A chaperone‐like function in holding and assembling newly synthesized mitochondrial polypeptide chains has been proposed. To further elucidate the function of this complex, structural information is necessary. In this study we use chemical crosslinking, connecting lysine side chains, which are well scattered along the sequence. Crosslinked peptides from protease digested prohibitin complexes were identified with mass spectrometry. From these results, spatial restraints for possible protein conformation were obtained. Many interaction sites between PHB1 and PHB2 were found, whereas no homodimeric interactions were observed. Secondary and tertiary structural predictions were made using several algorithms and the models best fitting the spatial restraints were selected for further evaluation. From the structure predictions and the crosslink data we derived a structural building block of one PHB1 and one PHB2 subunit, strongly intertwined along most of their length. The size of the complex implies that approximately 14 of these building blocks are present. Each unit contains a putative transmembrane helix in PHB2. Taken together with the unit building block we postulate a circular palisade‐like arrangement of the building blocks projecting into the intermembrane space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Horvath, S. E., & Daum, G. (2013) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.002 · Cited by 907
Sinz, A. (2006) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20082 · Cited by 648
Merkwirth, C., Dargazanli, S., Tatsuta, T., Geimer, S., Löwer, B., Wunderlich, F. T., von Kleist-Retzow, J.-C., Waisman, A., Westermann, B., & Langer, T. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.460708 · Cited by 526
Merkwirth, C., & Langer, T. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.05.013 · Cited by 403
Formation of Membrane-bound Ring Complexes by Prohibitins in Mitochondria
Tatsuta, T., Model, K., & Langer, T. (2005) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-09-0807 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Back, J. W., Sanz, M. A., de Jong, L., de Koning, L. J., Nijtmans, L. G. J., de Koster, C. G., Grivell, L. A., van der Spek, H., & Muijsers, A. O.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2471-2478
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-896X
- OpenAlex
- W2125572210
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A structure for the yeast prohibitin complex: Structure prediction and evidence from chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.0212602
- The paper
- Back, J. W., Sanz, M. A., de Jong, L., de Koning, L. J., Nijtmans, L. G. J., de Koster, C. G., Grivell, L. A., van der Spek, H., & Muijsers, A. O. (2002). A structure for the yeast prohibitin complex: Structure prediction and evidence from chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.0212602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.