Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A normalized root‐mean‐spuare distance for comparing protein three‐dimensional structures

Open access
Carugo, Oliviero, Pongor, Sándor·2001·Protein Science

Abstract

The degree of similarity of two protein three‐dimensional structures is usually measured with the root‐mean‐square distance between equivalent atom pairs. Such a similarity measure depends on the dimension of the proteins, that is, on the number of equivalent atom pairs. The present communication presents a simple procedure to make the root‐mean‐square distances between pairs of three‐dimensional structures independent of their dimensions. This normalization may be useful in evolutionary and fold classification studies as well as in simple comparisons between different structural models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1110/ps.690101

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Carugo, O., & Pongor, S.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1470-1473
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W2063581254
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A normalized root‐mean‐spuare distance for comparing protein three‐dimensional structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1110/ps.690101
The paper
Carugo, O., & Pongor, S. (2001). A normalized root‐mean‐spuare distance for comparing protein three‐dimensional structures. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.690101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.