The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Open accessAbstract
Background: With advances in technology, innovative teaching methods are being used to teach nasogastric catheterization.Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of training in nasogastric catheterization, delivered via traditional and virtual reality methods, on the knowledge, skills, self-confidence, anxiety and motivation of final-year nursing students.Methods: This randomized controlled experimental design study was conducted with 78 fourth-year nursing students (39 in the intervention group and 39 in the control group) between March and May 2024.Written permission was obtained from the ethics committee, the institution and the students.Data were collected via the 'Personal Information Form', 'Nasogastric Catheterization Application Knowledge Test', 'Nasogastric Catheter Application Checklist', 'Self-Confidence Visual Analog Scale', 'Anxiety Visual Analog Scale' and 'Instructional Material Motivation Scale for Single-use'.All the students were trained according to the course content.After the training, the students in the intervention group used the virtual-reality application, and the students in the control group used it with the traditional method.After the application, the students' skills were evaluated and post-tests were applied.The data were evaluated using chi-square analysis, independent-samples t-tests and two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.Results: There was no significant difference in knowledge and motivation scores between the intervention and control groups (p > 0.05).The students in the intervention group had significantly greater nasogastric catheterization skills, critical procedure step scores and self-confidence scores and lower anxiety scores than did those in the control group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Virtual reality was more effective than traditional methods at improving students' nasogastric catheterization skills, increasing their self-confidence and reducing their anxiety.Therefore, the use of virtual reality to teach psychomotor skills, such as nasogastric catheterization, should be expanded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873 · Cited by 394
Constructionist Gaming: Understanding the Benefits of Making Games for Learning
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1124022 · Cited by 383
Leading teachers' perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education
Kim, J. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5 · Cited by 376
Chiocchio, F., & Essiembre, H. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409335103 · Cited by 244
Quah, C. Y., & Ng, K. H. (2022) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1972608 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-05-13
- ISSN
- 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2729
- OpenAlex
- W4252778404
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/(issn)1365-2729
- The paper
- Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. (2010). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1365-2729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.