The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Broadening the range of designs and methods for impact evaluations
Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J., Forss, K., Davies, R., & Befani, B. (2012) · doi:10.22163/fteval.2012.100 · Cited by 369
Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care – a review of the evidence
Laugaland, K., Aase, K., & Barach, P. (2012) · WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/wor-2012-0544-2915 · Cited by 184
Reframing the challenges to integrated care: a complex-adaptive systems perspective
Tsasis, P., Evans, J. M., & Owen, S. (2012) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.843 · Cited by 172
Patient-reported outcome measures: Are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued?
Trujols, J., Portella, M. J., Iraurgi, I., Campins, M. J., Siñol, N., & Cobos, J. P. D. L. (2013) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.3109/09638237.2012.734653 · Cited by 129
Care at a Distance : On the Closeness of Technology
Pols, J. (2012) · doi:10.26530/oapen_413032 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-27
- ISSN
- 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4237342399
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/(issn)1365-2753
- The paper
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. (2010). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/(issn)1365-2753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
