The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids
Abstract
(2000). The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers: Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 356-369.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As such, some have argued that the designation of conservation zones can be taken to justify human use, and over-use, outside the boundaries.”
From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Zimmerer (2000, 362)
In the citing paper
“Here possibilities might serve Zimmerer's (2000) challenge of 'social justice conservation'-the idea that parks should be established with one explicit goal of supporting populations dependent on park resources.”
From Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation (2015) · cites this paper as Zimmerer (2000)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: water, power and identity in the Andean highlands
Boelens, R. (2014) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008 · Cited by 358
Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile
Budds, J. (2009) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008 · Cited by 339
Power of Maps: (Counter) Mapping for Conservation
Harris, L. M., & Hazen, H. D. (2015) · ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies · doi:10.14288/acme.v4i1.730 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerer, K. S.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 356-369
- ISSN
- 0004-5608
- 1467-8306
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0004-5608.00199
- The paper
- Zimmerer, K. S. (2000). The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00199
