The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Psychology of Immigration
Abstract
The discipline of psychology has much to contribute to our understanding of immigrants and the process of immigration. A framework is proposed that lays out two complementary domains of psychological research, both rooted in contextual factors, and both leading to policy and program development. The first (acculturation) stems from research in anthropology and is now a central part of cross‐ cultural psychology; the second (intergroup relations) stems from sociology and is now a core feature of social psychology. Both domains are concerned with two fundamental issues that face immigrants and the society of settlement: maintenance of group characteristics and contact between groups. The intersection of these issues creates an intercultural space, within which members of both groups develop their cultural boundaries and social relationships. A case is made for the benefits of integration as a strategy for immigrants and for multiculturalism as a policy for the larger society. The articles in this issue are then discussed in relation to these conceptual frameworks and empirical findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research.
Phinney, J. S. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499 · Cited by 3,798 · cited 1×
“…to a complex set of beliefs and attitudes that people have about themselves in relation to their culture group membership; usually these come to the fore when people are in contact with another culture, rather than when they live entirely within a single culture (Berry, 1996b; Phinney, 1990).”
Background
Cited by
Conceptual approaches to acculturation.
Berry, J. W. (2003) · Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. · doi:10.1037/10472-004 · Cited by 2,097
Self-citationStereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J., Bond, M. H., Croizet, J., Ellemers, N., Sleebos, E., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466608x314935 · Cited by 1,078
Rudmin, F. W. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037//1089-2680.7.1.3 · Cited by 848
Theoretical models of culture shock and adaptation in international students in higher education
Zhou, Y., Jindal-Snape, D., Topping, K., & Todman, J. (2008) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070701794833 · Cited by 755
Multiculturalism and acculturation: views of Dutch and Turkish–Dutch
Arends‐Tóth, J., & Vijver, F. J. R. V. D. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.143 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 615-631
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W1986051883
- Cited by
- 1,584
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Psychology of Immigration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0022-4537.00231
- The paper
- Berry, J. W. (2001). A Psychology of Immigration. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
