Cited by 201EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningCommunication in Education and Healthcare

It Ain’t Over ’til It’s Over: On Foreign Language Anxiety, First Language Deficits, and the Confounding of Variables

Horwitz, Elaine K.·2000·The Modern Language Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0026-7902.00067

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Horwitz, E. K.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Horwitz, Elaine K.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
256-259
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2011285536
Cited by
201
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
foreign language anxiety, confounding variables, second language acquisition, first language influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review