Cited by 199EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCommunication in Education and HealthcareSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The effect of multilingualism, sociobiographical, and situational factors on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety of mature language learners

Dewaele, Jean-Marc·2007·International Journal of Bilingualism

Abstract

The present study focuses on individual differences in levels of communicative anxiety (CA) and foreign language anxiety (FLA) in the first (L1), second (L2), third (L3) and fourth (L4) language of 106 adult language learners. Data were collected about CA/FLA levels when speaking with friends, with strangers, and speaking in public. The analyses revealed that multilinguals do experience more CA in stressful situations in their L1, but that levels of FLA are higher in languages learnt later in life. The knowledge of more languages was linked to lower levels of FLA in the L2. Female participants were only found to experience higher levels of CA in L1 public speech. Older participants tended to report higher levels of CA/FLA across languages. Rank orders for CA/FLA were significantly similar across the L1, L2, L3, and L4, which suggests that levels of CA/FLA are relatively stable and could be linked to a lower order personality trait such as emotional intelligence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13670069070110040301

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SLA researchers have mostly focused on the negative face of emotion, with anxiety being the most studied topic.

    “It is fair to say that SLA researchers have mostly focused on the negative face of emotion, with anxiety being the most studied topic (Dewaele, 2007;Horwitz, 2001;Lu & Liu, 2011;MacIntyre, 1999;MacIntyre & Gardner, 1991c;Saito, Garza, & Horwitz, 1999;Scovel, 1978; and for a review, see Horwitz's (2010) research timeline).”

    From The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom (2014) · cites this paper as Dewaele, 2007

    Section 3.1 traces foreign-language anxiety research back to the 1970s and discusses multiple strands of that research. The paper therefore supports anxiety as an established SLA research topic, but the passages do not establish that SLA researchers have mostly studied negative emotions or that anxiety is the most studied emotion. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. CURRAN, C. A. (1976). Counselling-learning in second languages. Apple River, IL: Apple River Press.
  2. GARDNER, R. C., SMYTHE, P. C., CLÉMENT, R., & GLIKSMAN, L. (1976). Social and psychological factors in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review , 32 , 198 - 213.
  3. MACINTYRE, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language teaching: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp.24 - 45) . Boston: Mc Graw-Hill.
  4. PHILLIPS, E. M. (1991). Anxiety and oral competence: Classroom dilemma. French Review , 65 , 1 - 14.
  5. Van DAELE, S. (2007). Linguïstische vlotheid, accuraatheid en complexiteit in de verwerving en de verwerking van een tweede taal [Linguistic fluency, accuracy and complexity in the acquisition and processing of a second language]. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Free University of Brussels.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dewaele, J.-M.
Affiliations
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
Venue
International Journal of Bilingualism
Published
2007-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
391-409
ISSN
  • 1367-0069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-6878
OpenAlex
W2035901651
Cited by
199
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Bilingualism (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
communication apprehension, foreign language anxiety, multilingualism, adult language learners, individual differences, situational factors, language order, emotional intelligence, public speaking anxiety, gender differences, age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review