The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Context‐Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scorekeeping in a language game
Lewis, D. (1979) · Journal of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/bf00258436 · Cited by 2,467
Wittgenstein, L. (1969) · Cited by 2,146
Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge
Goldman, A. I. (1976) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025679 · Cited by 1,870
Direct Reference: From Language to Thought
Récanati, F. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 778
Bach, K. (1994) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240778.001.0001 · Cited by 372
The pragmatic dimension of knowledge
Dretske, F. (1981) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00646423 · Cited by 372
Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification
Fogelin, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1093/0195089871.001.0001 · Cited by 366
Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism.
DeRose, K., & Williams, M. (1993) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185692 · Cited by 304
Cohen, S. (1986) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026434 · Cited by 263
The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters
Bach, K. (1997) · Pragmatik · doi:10.1007/978-3-663-11116-0_3 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Pritchard, D. (2005) · doi:10.1093/019928038x.001.0001 · Cited by 874
Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification
Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2002) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-111-1-67 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Rysiew, P.
- Venue
- Noûs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-514
- ISSN
- 0029-4624 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0068
- OpenAlex
- W2018438453
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Context‐Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0029-4624.00349
- The paper
- Rysiew, P. (2001). The Context‐Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
