The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters
Abstract
The distinction between semantics and pragmatics is easier to apply than to explain. Explaining it is complicated by the fact that many conflicting formulations have been proposed over the past sixty years. This might suggest that there is no one way of drawing the distinction and that how to draw it is merely a terminological question, a matter of arbitrary stipulation. In my view, though, these diverse formulations, despite their conflicts, all shed light on the distinction as it is commonly applied, in both linguistics and philosophy. Although it is generally clear what is at issue when people apply the distinction to specific linguistic phenomena, what is less clear, in some cases anyway, is whether a given phenomenon is semantic or pragmatic, or both. Fortunately, there are other phenomena that are uncontroversially semantic or, as the case may be, uncontroversially pragmatic. Their example will help us get clear on what the semantics-pragmatics distinction is.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Cited by
How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction
Evans, V. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.001.0001 · Cited by 357
The Context‐Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions
Rysiew, P. (2001) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00349 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Bach, K.
- Venue
- Pragmatik
- Publisher
- VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 33-50
- OpenAlex
- W1501261023
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-663-11116-0_3
- The paper
- Bach, K. (1997). The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters. Pragmatik. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11116-0_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.