The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the application of automated digital photogrammetry, using 1:3000 scale photography, to complex, natural landform surfaces, of typical interest to geomorphologists. It assesses the quality of the results obtained using a relatively cheap and readily available area based stereomatching package, in terms of precision, accuracy and external reliability. Precision is investigated with reference to the confidence that can be placed in individual matches. Accuracy is evaluated using specially collected, independent datasets obtained from an area of complex topography in Glen Affric, Scotland. Data collection was stratified to areas of different surface roughness. External reliability is judged with respect to estimates of slope, a key parameter in geomorphological investigations. The results show that, whilst the effects of grid density and vegetation correction are the most important controls upon the accuracy and the external reliability of the photogrammetric results, collection parameters associated with the stereomatching process can also exert some control, particularly in areas of complex topography. It is impossible to generalize rules for choice of optimal collection parameters without careful consideration of the surface under investigation. Given that maximum grid densities are defined by the object space pixel resolution, the paper concludes that surface quality is largely governed by traditional controls upon photogrammetric data quality (camera calibration, base:distance ratio, ground control), combined with either scanning density or digital image resolution. However, over some surfaces, careful consideration has to be given to the effect of matching parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
James, M. R., & Robson, S. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2011jf002289 · Cited by 1,116
James, M. R., Robson, S., & Smith, M. W. (2017) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4125 · Cited by 498
Sturzenegger, M., & Stead, D. (2009) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.004 · Cited by 468
Han, W., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Huang, X., Li, J., Wang, S., Chen, W., Li, X., Feng, R., et al. (2023) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.05.032 · Cited by 303
Kolecka, N., & Kozak, J. (2014) · Pure and Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s00024-013-0695-5 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, S. N., James, T. D., & Crowell, M. D.
- Venue
- The Photogrammetric Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 95
- Pages
- 793-821
- ISSN
- 0031-868X (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2075614191
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0031-868x.00152
- The paper
- Lane, S. N., James, T. D., & Crowell, M. D. (2000). Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research. The Photogrammetric Record. https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-868x.00152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.