Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density

Open access
White, Douglas R., Harary, Frank·2001·Sociological Methodology

Abstract

Abstract. The social cohesion of a group, as measured by patterns of network ties, increases with the level of redundancy of interconnections of its members. We will see that the minimal number k of independent paths that connect every pair of actors in a group, the higher the cohesion. The cohesiveness of a group is also measured by the extent to which it is not disconnected by removal of 1, 2, 3,..., n actors. Menger’s Theorem proves that these two measures are equivalent. Within this conceptual framework, we evaluate the family of concepts of cohesion and establish the validity of a pair of related measures: Connectivity – the minimum number k of its actors whose removal would not allow the group to remain connected or would reduce the group to but a single member – measures the social cohesion of a group at a general level; Conditional Density measures cohesion on a finer scale, that of surplus density beyond that implied by connectivity. For each k, these two measures may be combined into an aggregate measure of social cohesion, suitable for both small- and large-scale network studies. Using these measures within a new methodology of cohesive blocking we test hypotheses about the consequences of cohesion for social groups and their members, and demonstrate with empirical examples the significance and theoretical relevance of network cohesion as measured by connectivity in a variety of substantively important applications in sociology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0081-1750.00098

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
White, D. R., & Harary, F.
Venue
Sociological Methodology
Published
2001-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
305-359
ISSN
  • 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9531
OpenAlex
W1998644443
Cited by
296
References
30
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0081-1750.00098
The paper
White, D. R., & Harary, F. (2001). The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00098

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.