The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The social cohesion of a group, as measured by patterns of network ties, increases with the level of redundancy of interconnections of its members. We will see that the minimal number k of independent paths that connect every pair of actors in a group, the higher the cohesion. The cohesiveness of a group is also measured by the extent to which it is not disconnected by removal of 1, 2, 3,..., n actors. Menger’s Theorem proves that these two measures are equivalent. Within this conceptual framework, we evaluate the family of concepts of cohesion and establish the validity of a pair of related measures: Connectivity – the minimum number k of its actors whose removal would not allow the group to remain connected or would reduce the group to but a single member – measures the social cohesion of a group at a general level; Conditional Density measures cohesion on a finer scale, that of surplus density beyond that implied by connectivity. For each k, these two measures may be combined into an aggregate measure of social cohesion, suitable for both small- and large-scale network studies. Using these measures within a new methodology of cohesive blocking we test hypotheses about the consequences of cohesion for social groups and their members, and demonstrate with empirical examples the significance and theoretical relevance of network cohesion as measured by connectivity in a variety of substantively important applications in sociology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Pappi, F. U., & Scott, J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075047 · Cited by 5,969
An Information Flow Model for Conflict and Fission in Small Groups
Zachary, W. W. (1977) · Journal of Anthropological Research · doi:10.1086/jar.33.4.3629752 · Cited by 4,704
Social Pressures in Informal Groups
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707362 · Cited by 1,831
Maximal Flow Through a Network
Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (2009) · Classic Papers in Combinatorics · doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4842-8_15 · Cited by 1,829
Even, S. (1979) · Cited by 1,280
Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs.
Abelson, R. P., Harary, F., Norman, R. Z., & Cartwright, D. (1966) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2282802 · Cited by 1,273
Self-citationMenger, K. (1927) · Fundamenta Mathematicae · doi:10.4064/fm-10-1-96-115 · Cited by 1,216
Gibbons, A. (1985) · Cited by 828
Cited by
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Watts, D. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342 · Cited by 1,163
Powell, W. W., & Smith-Dor, L. (2003) · Journal of Economic Sociology · doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2003-3-61-105 · Cited by 818
Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2162 · Cited by 787
The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999
Moody, J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900204 · Cited by 738
Metadata
- Authors
- White, D. R., & Harary, F.
- Venue
- Sociological Methodology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 305-359
- ISSN
- 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9531
- OpenAlex
- W1998644443
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0081-1750.00098
- The paper
- White, D. R., & Harary, F. (2001). The Cohesiveness of Blocks In Social Networks: Node Connectivity and Conditional Density. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.