The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999
Abstract
Has sociology become more socially integrated over the last 30 years? Recent work in the sociology of knowledge demonstrates a direct linkage between social interaction patterns and the structure of ideas, suggesting that scientific collaboration networks affect scientific practice. I test three competing models for sociological collaboration networks and find that a structurally cohesive core that has been growing steadily since the early 1960s characterizes the discipline's coauthorship network. The results show that participation in the sociology collaboration network depends on research specialty and that quantitative work is more likely to be coauthored than non-quantitative work. However, structural embeddedness within the network core given collaboration is largely unrelated to specialty area. This pattern is consistent with a loosely overlapping specialty structure that has potentially integrative implications for theoretical development in sociology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As scientific fields evolve, new subfields initially emerge around methods or technologies which become a focus of collective puzzle-solving and continual improvement (Moody, 2004).”
From Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames (2018) · cites this paper as Moody, 2004
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720 · cited 2×
“Past research on stratification in the sciences has identified large inequality in the returns to scientific labor (Allison, Long and Krauze 1982; Cole and Cole 1973; Merton 1968).”
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Whitley, R. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199240531.001.0001 · Cited by 1,076
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 60
- 10.2307/2654383 · DOI
- Abbott Andrew., 2001, Chaos of Disciplines
- 10.2307/2095162 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12108-999-1007-5 · DOI
- Bearman Peter., 1993, Relations into Rhetorics: Local Elite Social Structure in Norfolk, England: 1540–1640
- 10.1086/228631 · DOI
- 10.1086/228667 · DOI
- 10.2307/2096210 · DOI
- Cole Jonathan R., 1973, Social Stratification in Science
- 10.1086/210040 · DOI
- Collins Randall., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology, 62
- 10.1086/228424 · DOI
- 10.2307/2654382 · DOI
- Crane Diana., 1972, Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities
- Crane Diana, 1992, Sociology and Its Publics: The Forms and Fates of Disciplinary Organization, 197
- 10.1007/s12108-001-1029-0 · DOI
- 10.2307/2093295 · DOI
- Davis James A., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology?, 99
- Davis James A., 1972, Sociological Theories in Progress, 2, 218
- 10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5 · DOI
- Endersby J. W., 1996, Social Science Quarterly, 77, 375
- 10.2307/2096209 · DOI
- Fisher Bonnie S., 1998, Political Science Online, 847
- 10.1017/CBO9780511527524 · DOI
- 10.1086/341744 · DOI
- Hagstrom Warren O., 1965, The Scientific Community
- Harary Frank, 1965, Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs
- Hargens Lowell., 1975, Patterns of Scientific Research
- 10.1177/104649647100200201 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.10.3.153 · DOI
- 10.1038/423605a · DOI
- Kuhn Thomas., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- 10.1086/262132 · DOI
- 10.2307/2095896 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141122 · DOI
- Mannheim Karl., 1936, Ideology and Utopia
- Markovsky Barry., 1998, The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models, 343
- 10.1086/343192 · DOI
- 10.2307/1924423 · DOI
- Milgram S., 1969, Psychology Today, 22, 61
- 10.1086/338954 · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240306800105 · DOI
- Newman M. E. J., 2000, Models of the Small World
- 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118 · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240106600306 · DOI
- Palmer Edger N., 1985, Graphical Evolution: An Introduction to the Theory of Random Graphs
- 10.2307/3090139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02025829 · DOI
- Simmel Georg., 1950, The Sociology of Georg Simmel
- Simpson Ida H., 2001, What's Wrong With Sociology, 271
- Skvoretz John., 1998, What is Social Theory? The Philosophical Debates, 238
- 10.1007/BF01476366 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001513 · DOI
- 10.1086/210318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0081-1750.00098 · DOI
- White Douglas R., 2002, Análisis de Redes: Aplicaciones en Ciencias Sociales, 41
- Zuckerman Harriet., 1977, Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in The United States
- Zuckerman Harriet, 1973, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 497
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/432782 · Cited by 1,885
Similar neural responses predict friendship
Parkinson, C., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7 · Cited by 388
Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings
Leahey, E. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200403 · Cited by 356
The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003 · Cited by 288
Koseoglu, M. A. (2016) · BRQ Business Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Moody, J.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-238
- ISSN
- 0003-1224
- 1939-8271
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review