The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"The Real is Relational": An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism
Abstract
An internal reconstruction and an immanent critique of Bourdieu's generative structuralism is presented. Rather than starting with the concept of “habitus,” as is usually done, the article tries to systematically reconstruct Bourdieu's theory by an analysis of the relational logic that permeates his whole work Tracing the debt Bourdieu's approach owes to Bachelard's rationalism and Cassirer's relationalism, the article examines Bourdieu's epistemological writings of the 1960s and 70s. It tries to make the case that Bourdieu's sociological metascience represents a rationalist version of Bhaskar's critical realism, and enjoins Bourdieu to give heed to the realist turn in the philosophy of the natural and the social sciences. The article shows how Bourdieu's epistemological assumptions are reflected in his primary theoretical constructs of “habitus” and “field.” To concretize their discussion, it analyzes Bourdieu's reinterpretation of Weber in his theory of the field of religion and of the young Mannheim in his theory of the scientific field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ross, E. J., & Merton, R. K. (1958) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709394 · Cited by 10,315
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy
(2020) · On Violence · doi:10.1515/9780822390169-009 · Cited by 9,870
(1987) · Cited by 8,955
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.
Parsons, H. L., & Giddens, A. (1980) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2107414 · Cited by 4,926
Tractatus logico-philosophicus
(2021) · Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus · doi:10.2307/j.ctv22d4t7n.8 · Cited by 4,869
Habermas, J. (1968) · Cited by 4,683
Cited by
It is value that brings universes into being
Graeber, D. (2013) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/hau3.2.012 · Cited by 337
LIZARDO, O. (2007) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00340.x · Cited by 120
Examining grounded theory through the lens of rationalist epistemology
Albert, M., Mylopoulos, M., & Laberge, S. (2019) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9849-7 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandenberghe, F.
- Venue
- Sociological Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-67
- ISSN
- 0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9558
- OpenAlex
- W2162374262
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: "The Real is Relational": An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0735-2751.00064
- The paper
- Vandenberghe, F. (1999). "The Real is Relational": An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism. Sociological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.