Cited by 120Action Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended CognitionContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

“Mirror Neurons,” Collective Objects and the Problem of Transmission: Reconsidering Stephen Turner's Critique of Practice Theory

LIZARDO, OMAR·2007·Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Abstract

In this paper, I critically examine Stephen Turner's (1994) critique of practice theory in light of recent neurophysiological discoveries regarding the “mirror neuron system” in the pre‐frontal mo‐tor cortex of humans and other primates. I argue that two of Turner's strongest objections against the sociological version of the practice‐theoretical account, the problem of transmission and the problem of sameness, are substantially undermined when examined from the perspective of re‐cently systematized accounts of embodied learning and intersubjective action understanding in‐spired by these developments. In addition, I show that the practice‐theoretical framework out‐lined by Pierre Bourdieu in the Logic of Practice and other works is, in contrast to Turner's por‐trayal of a confused hodgepodge of logical errors and empirical impossibilities, largely consistent with the latest neurophysiological evidence and as such fundamentally foreshadowed more recent understandings of the neurocognitive foundations of the perception, understanding and structure of the motor schemes productive of action in the world. Also in line with these newer neurosci‐entific developments, the practice‐theoretical focus on the body as the central matrix generative of tacit understandings and analogical operations responsible for “higher order” systems of classi‐fication emerges as the key to solving some of the thorniest problems in the theory of action: eliminating to need to resort to unwarranted “colle…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00340.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contemporary cognitive science findings do not support the assumption that an embodied individual could implicitly acquire an implicit cognitive element (e.g., a specific class habitus) assumed to be socially shared by the members of a particular group (e.g., a working class) merely by perceiving and simulating other members' actions.

    “But Turner(2007) maintains that these facts, contra Lizardo's(2007) claims, do not support the assumption that an embodied individual would be able to implicitly acquire an implicit cognitive element (e.g. a specific class habitus) that is assumed to be socially shared by the members of a particular group (e.g. a working class) by simply perceiving and simulating other members' actions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LIZARDO, O.
Venue
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
319-350
ISSN
  • 0021-8308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5914
OpenAlex
W2127869117
Cited by
120
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
mirror neuron system, practice theory, Stephen Turner, Pierre Bourdieu, logic of practice, embodied learning, tacit knowledge, philosophy of action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review