Cited by 47Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchGenetic diversity and population structure

Spatial variation buffers temporal fluctuations in early juvenile survival for an endangered P acific salmon

Thorson, James T., Scheuerell, Mark D., Buhle, Eric R., Copeland, Timothy·2014·Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

Spatial, phenotypic and genetic diversity at relatively small scales can buffer species against large-scale processes such as climate change that tend to synchronize populations and increase temporal variability in overall abundance or production. This portfolio effect generally results in improved biological and economic outcomes for managed species. Previous evidence for the portfolio effect in salmonids has arisen from examinations of time series of adult abundance, but we lack evidence of spatial buffering of temporal variability in demographic rates such as survival of juveniles during their first year of life. We therefore use density-dependent population models with multiple random effects to represent synchronous (similar among populations) and asynchronous (different among populations) temporal variability as well as spatial variability in survival. These are fitted to 25 years of survey data for breeding adults and surviving juveniles from 15 demographically distinct populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) within a single metapopulation in the Snake River in Idaho, USA. Model selection identifies the most support for the model that included both synchronous and asynchronous temporal variability, in addition to spatial variability. Asynchronous variability (log-SD = 0·55) is approximately equal in magnitude to synchronous temporal variability (log-SD = 0·67), but much lower than spatial variability (log-SD = 1·11). We also show that the pairwise corr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2656.12117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorson, J. T., Scheuerell, M. D., Buhle, E. R., & Copeland, T.
Affiliations
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • Idaho Department of Fish and Game (US)
Corresponding author
Thorson, James T.
Venue
Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-06
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
157-167
ISSN
  • 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2656
OpenAlex
W2143316722
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bonneville Power Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
portfolio effect, temporal synchronization, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, spatial diversity, juvenile production, carrying capacity, Snake River, endangered species conservation, population persistence
MeSH terms
Animals, Demography, Longevity, Models, Biological, Salmon, Time Factors, Endangered Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review