Drivers of individual niche variation in coexisting species
Abstract
Although neglected by classic niche theory, individual variation is now recognized as a prevalent phenomenon in nature with evolutionary and ecological relevance. Recent theory suggests that differences in individual variation across competitors can affect species coexistence and community patterns. However, the degree of individual variation is flexible across wild populations and we still know little about the ecological drivers of this variation across populations of single species and, especially, across coexisting species. Here, we aimed to (a) elucidate the major drivers of individual niche variation in natural communities and (b) to determine how consistent this variation is across coexisting species and communities. We analysed natural patterns of individual-level niche variation in four species of coexisting generalist frogs across a wide range of tropical communities. Specifically, we used gut contents and stable isotopes (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) from frog species and their prey to quantify individual niche specialization. Then, we combined data on local community structure, availability of prey, phylogenetic relationships and predator-prey size models to test how this variation is related to four ecological factors which are predicted to be key drivers of individual specialization: intraspecific competition, interspecific competition, ecological opportunity (i.e., diversity of resources) and predation. We found that the degree of individual trophic specialization varied…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Natural niche variation patterns were observed within four co-existing frog species which discovered four ecological factors for specificity: interspecific competition, intraspecific competition, predation, and ecological opportunity.
“Natural niche variation patterns were observed within four co-existing frog species which discovered four ecological factors for specificity: interspecific competition, intraspecific competition, predation, and ecological opportunity (Costa-Pereira & et al., 2018).”
From An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria (2022) · cites this paper as Costa-Pereira & et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Individualised niches: an integrative conceptual framework across behaviour, ecology, and evolution
Krüger, O., Anaya‐Rojas, J., Back, M., Caspers, B., Chakarov, N., Dammhahn, M., Elliott‐Graves, A., Fricke, C., Gadau, J., Hoffman, J. I., et al. (2026) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1002/brv.70147 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
An Investigation into the Perception and Prevalence of Mixed-Species Exhibits in Zoos and Aquaria
Green, H., Palmer, G. A., & Brereton, J. E. (2022) · Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.56397/jrssh.2022.12.02 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Costa‐Pereira, R., Rudolf, V. H. W., Souza, F. L., & Araújo, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Costa‐Pereira, Raul
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1452-1464
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2810370903
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (#2014/20924‐5, #2016/09038‐9, #2017/20069‐6, #2010/15567‐8)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (#303006/2014‐5)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- species coexistence, trophic specialization, intraspecific competition, interspecific competition, intraguild predation, ecological opportunity, gut contents, stable isotopes, prey availability, community structure, phylogenetic relationships
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Ecology, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Predatory Behavior, Species Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review