The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower‐visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species?
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Domestic gardens typically consist of a mixture of native and non‐native plants which support biodiversity and provide valuable ecosystem services, particularly in urban environments. Many gardeners wish to encourage biodiversity by choosing appropriate plant taxa. The value of native and non‐native plants in supporting animal biodiversity is, however, largely unknown. The relative value of native and non‐native garden plants to invertebrates was investigated in a replicated field experiment. Plots (deliberately akin to garden borders) were planted with one of three treatments, representing assemblages of plants based on origin (native, near‐native and exotic). Invertebrates and resource measurements were recorded over four years. This paper reports the abundance of flower‐visiting aerial insects (‘pollinators’) associated with the three plant assemblages. For all pollinator groups on all treatments, greater floral resource resulted in an increase in visits. There was, however, a greater abundance of total pollinators recorded on native and near‐native treatments compared with the exotic plots. Short‐tongued bumblebees followed the same pattern whilst more hoverflies were recorded on the native treatment than the other treatments, and more honeybees on the near‐native treatment. There was no difference between treatments in abundance of long‐tongued bumblebees or solitary bees. The lack of difference in solitary bee abundance between treatments was probably due to a third of individuals from this group being recorded on one exotic plant species. The number of flower visitors corresponded to the peak flowering period of the treatments, that is there were fewer flower visitors to the exotic treatment compared with the other treatments in early summer but relatively more later in the season. Synthesis and applications. This experiment has demonstrated that utilizing plants from only a single region of origin (i.e. nativeness) may not be an optimal strategy for resource provision for pollinating insects in gardens. Gardens can be enhanced as a habitat by planting a variety of flowering plants, biased towards native and near‐native species but with a selection of exotics to extend the flowering season and potentially provide resources for specialist groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
World Urbanization Prospects: The 1996 Revision
Brockerhoff, M., & Nations, U. (1998) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2808041 · Cited by 5,881
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
NOSS, R. F. (1990) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · Cited by 3,151
Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters
Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M., & Ollerton, J. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265575 · Cited by 1,934
New flora of the British Isles
Stace, C. A., & Thompson, H. S. (1991) · Cited by 1,567
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G. L., Williamson, M., & Kirschner, J. (2004) · TAXON · doi:10.2307/4135498 · Cited by 1,483
Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation.
Morris, M. G., Pollard, E., & Yates, T. J. (1995) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2404667 · Cited by 1,051
The Potential Conservation Value of Non‐Native Species
SCHLAEPFER, M. A., SAX, D. F., & OLDEN, J. D. (2011) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x · Cited by 765
New Flora of the British Isles
Schmid, R., & Stace, C. (1998) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1224068 · Cited by 712
The domestic garden – Its contribution to urban green infrastructure
Cameron, R. W. F., Blanuša, T., Taylor, J. E., Salisbury, A., Halstead, A. J., Henricot, B., & Thompson, K. (2012) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002 · Cited by 593
Self-citation
Cited by
A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities
Baldock, K. C. R., Goddard, M. A., Hicks, D. M., Kunin, W. E., Mitschunas, N., Morse, H., Osgathorpe, L. M., Potts, S. G., Robertson, K. M., Scott, A. V., et al. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0769-y · Cited by 513
The role of ‘nativeness’ in urban greening to support animal biodiversity
Berthon, K., Thomas, F., & Bekessy, S. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103959 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Salisbury, A., Armitage, J., Bostock, H., Perry, J., Tatchell, M., & Thompson, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1156-1164
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1694297514
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 17.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower‐visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2664.12499
- The paper
- Salisbury, A., Armitage, J., Bostock, H., Perry, J., Tatchell, M., & Thompson, K. (2015). EDITOR'S CHOICE: Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower‐visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species? Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.