Cited by 67Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Phylogenetic diversity is maintained despite richness losses over time in restored tallgrass prairie plant communities

Open access
Barber, Nicholas A., Jones, Holly P., Duvall, Melvin R., Wysocki, William P., Hansen, Michael J., Gibson, David J.·2017·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Ecosystem restoration is an important tool for mitigating biodiversity loss and recovering critical ecosystem services to humanity, but restoration rarely takes into account the evolutionary attributes of the community being restored. Phylogenetic diversity ( PD ) represents a potentially valuable measure of restoration success because it can correlate with functional trait diversity that drives ecosystem function. However, PD patterns in restored communities are rarely assessed. We surveyed plant communities in restored tallgrass prairies 2–19 years old and calculated two PD measures, SES MNTD and SES MPD , of the communities and seed mixture applied to sites. We also identified high‐threat exotic species present in each site to determine whether PD of the seed mixture applied was related to resistance against invasion. We show that PD in North American tallgrass prairie restorations, as measured by both SES MNTD and SES MPD , is maintained over time even as richness declines. Neither the resulting community PD nor invasion by high‐threat exotic species was affected by PD of the seed mixture used in site restoration. Thus, simply maximizing PD of seed mixtures without considering the particular component species is unlikely to help achieve restoration goals. Synthesis and applications . These results suggest that species losses over time are not biased towards species with or without close relatives in the community. If phylogenetic diversity (PD) reflects functional trait diversity in communities, then local declines in species richness may not necessarily mean the loss of ecosystem function in restoration projects. However, PD of restored communities may be limited by low establishment rates for most species. Conservation practitioners should consider PD with careful planning to maintain overall community diversity and potentially maximize ecosystem function and services in restorations. This perspective will require a deeper understanding of the relationships between phylogenetic relatedness and traits associated with competition and fitness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2664.12639

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soil microbial communities and soil carbon levels on agricultural land approached those of remnant prairies within 13 years, after prairie species were planted.

    “Others [27] reported that soil microbial communities and soil carbon levels on agricultural land approached those of remnant prairies within 13 years, after prairie species were planted.”

    From From the Ground Up: Prairies on Reclaimed Mine Land—Impacts on Soil and Vegetation (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Sites Selection and Surveys section describes former agricultural sites planted with native prairie seeds, but the paper reports surveys of plants, not soil microbes or soil carbon. It also says the restored plant communities were not compared with remnants. Searches for the 13-year soil-microbial and soil-carbon finding found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]45. Schramm, P. (1990) Prairie restoration: a twenty-five year perspective on establishment and management. Proceedings of the Twelfth North Amer- ican Prairie Conference. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA, USA. pp. 5-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barber, N. A., Jones, H. P., Duvall, M. R., Wysocki, W. P., Hansen, M. J., & Gibson, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Barber, Nicholas A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-18
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
137-144
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2292390270
Cited by
67
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Northern Illinois University
  • Southern Illinois University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
phylogenetic diversity, tallgrass prairie restoration, plant community diversity, species richness decline, seed mixtures, invasion resistance, functional trait diversity, ecosystem functioning, restoration success

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review