Cited by 140Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesBiological Control of Invasive Species

Assessing patterns in introduction pathways of alien species by linking major invasion data bases

Open access
Saul, Wolf‐Christian, Roy, Helen E., Booy, Olaf, Carnevali, Lucilla, Chen, Hsuan‐Ju, Genovesi, Piero, Harrower, Colin A., Hulme, Philip E. +3 more·2017·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Preventing the arrival of invasive alien species (IAS) is a major priority in managing biological invasions. However, information on introduction pathways is currently scattered across many data bases that often use different categorisations to describe similar pathways. This hampers the identification and prioritisation of pathways to meet the main targets of recent environmental policies. Therefore, we integrate pathway information from two major IAS data bases, IUCN's Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) and the DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway, applying the new standard categorisation scheme recently adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). We describe the process of mapping pathways from the individual data bases to the CBD scheme and provide, for the first time, detailed descriptions of the standard pathway categories. The combined data set includes pathway information for 8323 species across major taxonomic groups (plants, vertebrates, invertebrates, algae, fungi, other) and environments (terrestrial, freshwater, marine). We analyse the data for major patterns in the introduction pathways, highlighting that the specific research question and context determines whether the combined or an individual data set is the better information source for such analyses. While the combined data set provides an improved basis for direction‐setting in invasion management policies on the global level, individual data sets often better reflect regional idiosyncrasies. The combined data set should thus be considered in addition to, rather than replacing, existing individual data sets. Pathway patterns derived from the combined and individual data sets show that the intentional pathways ‘Escape’ and ‘Release’ are most important for plants and vertebrates, while for invertebrates, algae, fungi and micro‐organisms unintentional transport pathways prevail. Differences in pathway proportions among marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments are much less pronounced. The results also show that IAS with highest impacts in Europe are on average associated with a greater number of pathways than other alien species and are more frequently introduced both intentionally and unintentionally. Synthesis and applications. Linking data bases on invasive alien species by harmonising and consolidating their pathway information is essential to turn dispersed data into useful knowledge. The standard pathway categorisation scheme recently adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity may be crucial to facilitate this process. Our study demonstrates the value of integrating major invasion data bases to help managers and policymakers reach robust conclusions about patterns in introduction pathways and thus aid effective prevention and prioritisation in invasion management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2664.12819

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Representation of introduction pathways differs only slightly among marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments.

    “The intentional pathways ‘escape’ and ‘release’ are most important for plants and vertebrates, whereas for invertebrates, algae, fungi, and microorganisms, unintentional ‘contaminant’ and ‘stowaway’ transport pathways prevail; representation of these pathways differs only slightly among marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments (Saul et al., 2017).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Saul et al., 2017

  • The intentional pathways escape and release are most important for plants and vertebrates, whereas for invertebrates, algae, fungi, and microorganisms, unintentional contaminant and stowaway transport pathways prevail.

    “The intentional pathways ‘escape’ and ‘release’ are most important for plants and vertebrates, whereas for invertebrates, algae, fungi, and microorganisms, unintentional ‘contaminant’ and ‘stowaway’ transport pathways prevail; representation of these pathways differs only slightly among marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments (Saul et al., 2017).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Saul et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants

    van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Pergl, J., Winter, M., Weber, E., Kreft, H., Weigelt, P., Kartesz, J., Nishino, M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14910 · Cited by 1,095 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Alien species, introduced by humans beyond their native range, are arriving in new regions at unprecedented rates world-wide (Essl et al. 2015; van Kleunen et al. 2015), and a proportion, the so-called invasive alien species (IAS), have negative consequences for the economy and environment in the…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Driscoll, D.A., Catford, J.A., Barney, J.N., Hulme, P.E., Inderjit, Martin, T.G. et al. (2014) New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111, 16622-16627.
  2. Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Official Journal of the European Union, L317, 35-55.
  3. Hulme, P.E. (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 10-18.
  4. Hulme, P.E. (2015) Invasion pathways at a crossroad: policy & research challenges for managing alien species introductions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 1418- 1424.
  5. Hulme, P.E., Bacher, S., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Minchin, D. et al. (2008) Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 403-414.
  6. Mack, R.N. (2003) Global plant dispersal, naturalization, and invasion: pathways, modes, and circumstances. Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies (eds G.M. Ruiz & J.T. Carlton), pp. 3-30. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  7. Perrings, C., Burgiel, S., Lonsdale, M., Mooney H. & Williamson, M. (2010) International cooperation in the solution to trade-related invasive species risks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1195, 198-212.
  8. Roy, H.E. & Wajnberg, E. (eds) (2008) From Biological Control to Invasion: The Ladybird Harmonia axyridis as a Model Species. Springer, Dordrecht.
  9. Seebens, H., Gastner, M.T. & Blasius, B. (2013) The risk of marine bioinvasion caused by global shipping. Ecology Letters, 16, 782-790.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saul, W., Roy, H. E., Booy, O., Carnevali, L., Chen, H., Genovesi, P., Harrower, C. A., Hulme, P. E., Pagad, S., Pergl, J., & Jeschke, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (DE)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Animal and Plant Health Agency (GB)
  • Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
Saul, Wolf‐Christian
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
657-669
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W2531570771
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (JE 288/7‐1, JE 288/9‐1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology (TD1209, RVO 67985939)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (P504/11/1028)
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Biological Control of Invasive Species
Keywords
invasive species, introduction pathways, DAISIE, Convention on Biological Diversity, intentional introductions, invasive species management, biological invasions, species impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review