Limited biomass recovery from gold mining in Amazonian forests
Open accessAbstract
Gold mining has rapidly increased across the Amazon Basin in recent years, especially in the Guiana shield, where it is responsible for >90% of total deforestation. However, the ability of forests to recover from gold mining activities remains largely unquantified. Forest inventory plots were installed on recently abandoned mines in two major mining regions in Guyana, and re‐censused 18 months later, to provide the first ground‐based quantification of gold mining impacts on Amazon forest biomass recovery. We found that woody biomass recovery rates on abandoned mining pits and tailing ponds are among the lowest ever recorded for tropical forests, with close to no woody biomass recovery after 3–4 years. On the overburden sites (i.e. areas not mined but where excavated soil is deposited), however, above‐ground biomass recovery rates (0.4–5.4 Mg ha −1 year −1 ) were within the range of those recorded in other secondary forests across the Neotropics following abandonment of pastures and agricultural lands. Our results suggest that forest recovery is more strongly limited by severe mining‐induced depletion of soil nutrients, especially nitrogen, than by mercury contamination, due to slowing of growth in nutrient‐stripped soils. We estimate that the slow recovery rates in mining pits and ponds currently reduce carbon sequestration across Amazonian secondary forests by ~21,000 t C/year, compared to the carbon that would have accumulated following more traditional land uses such as agriculture or pasture. Synthesis and applications . To achieve large‐scale restoration targets, Guyana and other Amazonian countries will be challenged to remediate previously mined lands. The recovery process is highly dependent on nitrogen availability rather than mercury contamination, affecting woody biomass regrowth. The significant recovery in overburden zones indicates that one potential active remediation strategy to promote biomass recovery may be to backfill mining pits and ponds with excavated soil.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Artisanal gold mining releases large amounts of mercury into the environment.
“it causes not only deforestation, river siltation, and soil erosion, but also releases large amounts of mercury into the environment.”
From Health Risk Assessment of Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Munduruku Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Mercury is a toxic heavy metal that contaminates the atmosphere, waters, sediments, and organisms.
“Mercury is a toxic heavy metal that contaminates the atmosphere, waters, sediments, and organisms [23,24].”
From Health Risk Assessment of Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Munduruku Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Gold mining causes mercury contamination in fish, and consequently increases health risks associated with fish consumption.
“However, gold mining causes mercury (Hg) contamination in fish, and consequently increases health risks associated with fish consumption.”
From Health Risk Assessment of Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Munduruku Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Amazon (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., Boukili, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16512 · Cited by 1,210 · see citing works
Self-citationRitchie, M. E., & Raina, R. (2016) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.09.001 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vasconcellos, A. C. S. D., Hallwass, G., Bezerra, J. G., Aciole, A. N. S., Meneses, H. N. D. M., Lima, M. D. O., Jesus, I. M. D., Hacon, S. D. S., & Basta, P. C. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18157940 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kalamandeen, M., Gloor, E., Johnson, I., Agard, S., Katow, M., Vanbrooke, A., Ashley, D., Batterman, S. A., Ziv, G., Holder‐Collins, K., Phillips, O. L., Brondizio, E. S., Vieira, I., & Galbraith, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Guyana School of Forestry Annandale Guyana
- Guyana Geology and Mines Commission Georgetown Guyana
- Centre Casa (CA)
- Guyana Forestry Commission (GY)
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
- Department of Biology University of Guyana Georgetown Guyana
- Department of Anthropology Indiana University Bloomington IN USA
- Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Kalamandeen, Michelle
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-28
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1730-1740
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W3037793065
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N004655/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Keywords
- gold mining, abandoned mines, tailings ponds, mining pits, overburden, secondary forest, Amazon rainforest, Guiana Shield, soil nutrient depletion, nitrogen starvation, mercury contamination, carbon sequestration, forest restoration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review