Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence that acidification‐induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below‐ground communities and soil properties in a semi‐arid steppe

Chen, Dima, Lan, Zhichun, Bai, Xue, Grace, James B., Bai, Yongfei·2013·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Anthropogenic acid deposition–induced soil acidification is one of the major threats to biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and services. Few studies, however, have explored in detail how above‐ground changes in plant species richness and productivity resulting from soil acidification are mediated by effects on below‐ground biota and soil properties. To increase our understanding of this linkage, we collected data on below‐ and above‐ground communities and soil properties in a 3‐year field experiment with seven levels of acid addition rate to build‐up broad intensities of soil acidification in the semi‐arid I nner M ongolian grassland. Acid addition directly elevated concentrations of soil Al 3+ions, decreased the base cations Ca 2+, Mg 2+and Na+, and increased soil moisture and available phosphorus. Acid addition also appears to have altered the soil microbial community via changes in H+and Al 3+ions and altered the nematode community via changes in H+ions and soil moisture. The observed changes in soil N availability (i.e. net N mineralization,‐N and‐N) could be explained by mediating changes in the H+and Al 3+ions, microbial community (i.e. community structure, bacteria and fungi/bacteria as indicated by phospholipid fatty acids analysis) and the nematode community (i.e. total abundance, taxa richness and maturity index). Declines in plant species richness and productivity were greater at high intensities of soil acidification in the second sampling year than in the first sampling year.The changes in plant community observed were mostly explained by soil nutrient pathways (e.g. N availability or base mineral cations), which were in turn regulated by the soil microbial or nematode communities as well as by the direct effects of the increase in H+or Al 3+ions. Synthesis. Our results suggest that the below‐ground microbial and nematode communities are more sensitive to soil acidification than the plant communities are, and further that soil acidification–induced changes in plants are mediated by changes in below‐ground communities and soil nutrients. These findings improve our understanding of the links between below‐ and above‐ground communities in the I nner M ongolia grassland, especially in the context of anthropogenic acid enrichment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2745.12119

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Chen, D., Lan, Z., Bai, X., Grace, J. B., & Bai, Y.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-26
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
1322-1334
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2119181798
Cited by
310
References
47
FWCI
20.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence that acidification‐induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below‐ground communities and soil properties in a semi‐arid steppe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12119
The paper
Chen, D., Lan, Z., Bai, X., Grace, J. B., & Bai, Y. (2013). Evidence that acidification‐induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below‐ground communities and soil properties in a semi‐arid steppe. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.