Cited by 177Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Long‐term biological legacies of herbivore density in a landscape‐scale experiment: forest understoreys reflect past deer density treatments for at least 20 years

Open access
Nuttle, Tim, Ristau, Todd E., Royo, Alejandro A.·2014·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Ungulate browsers, when at high densities, are major drivers of vegetation change in forests world‐wide. Their effects operate via a variety of generalizable mechanisms related to plant palatability and relative growth rate with respect to browsing pressure. Though such impacts are obviously long‐lasting when they determine composition of tree regeneration, we document in a unique long‐term (30 year) experiment that biological legacies of initial deer density persist in the understorey herbaceous vegetation at least 20 years after deer densities were equalized. We sampled understorey vegetation in former clear‐cut areas where density of white‐tailed deer (O docoileus virginianus) was manipulated (3.9–31.2 deer km−2) for 10 years (1979–1990), and stands experienced ambient deer density (ca. 10–12 deer km−2) for the next 20 years (1990–2010) to determine whether initial deer density treatments still influenced understorey vegetation in 30‐year‐old, closed‐canopy forests. Stands initially (1979–1990) exposed to higher deer densities had ca. five times higher fern cover and three times the seedling and forb cover in 2010, as well as significantly lower angiosperm species density, compared to stands initially exposed to lower deer densities. These results appear driven by deer avoidance of ferns, allowing them to expand at high deer density and sequester sites for decades. Synthesis. Our long‐term, experimental results show unequivocally that elevated deer densities cause significant, profound legacy effects on understorey vegetation persisting at least 20 years. Of relevance regionally and globally where high deer densities have created depauperate understoreys, we expect that deer density reduction alone does not guarantee understorey recovery; stands may need to be managed by removing recalcitrant understorey layers (e.g. ferns).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2745.12175

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Baines, D., Sage, R.B. & Baines, M.M. (1994) The implications of red deer grazing to ground vegetation and invertebrate communities of Scottish native pinewoods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 776-783.
  2. Balgooyen, C.P. & Waller, D.M. (1995) The use of Clintonia borealis and other indicators to gauge impacts of white-tailed deer on plant communities in northern Wisconsin, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 15, 308-318.
  3. Cardinal, E., Martin, J.-L., Tremblay, J.-P. & Côt e, S.D. (2012) An experimen- tal study of how variation in deer density affects vegetation and songbird assemblages of recently harvested boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Zool- ogy, 90, 704-713.
  4. Carson, W.P., Carson, J.A., Royo, A.A. & Kirschbaum, C. (2005) Plant com- munities growing on boulders in the Allegheny National Forest: evidence for boulders as refugia from deer and as a bioassay of overbrowsing. Natural Areas Journal, 25, 10-18.
  5. Côte, S.D., Rooney, T.P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C. & Waller, D.M. (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 35, 113-147.
  6. Engelman, H.M. & Nyland, R.D. (2006) Interference to hardwood regeneration in Northeastern North America: assessing and countering fern interference. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 23, 166-175.
  7. Hill, J.D. & Silander, J.J.A. (2001) Distribution and dynamics of two ferns: Dennstaedtia punctilobula (Dennstaedtiaceae) and Thelypteris noveboracensis (Thelypteridaceae) in a Northeast mixed hardwoods-hemlock forest. Ameri- can Journal of Botany, 88, 894-902.
  8. Horsley, S.B. & Marquis, D.A. (1983) Interference by weeds and deer with Allegheny Pennsylvania U.S.A. hardwood reproduction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 61-69.
  9. Littell, R.C., Pendergast, J. & Natarajan, R. (2004) Modelling covariance struc- ture in the analysis of repeated measures data. Tutorial in Biostatistics Vol- ume 2: Statistical Modeling of Complex Medical Data (ed. R.B. D'Agostino), pp. 159-185.
  10. Lutz, H.J. (1930) Original forest composition in northwestern Pennsylvania as indicated by early land survey notes. Journal of Forestry, 28, 1098- 1103.
  11. McShea, W.J., Underwood, H.B. & Rappole, J.H. (1997) The Science of Over- abundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Smithsonian Institu- tion Press, Washington, DC.
  12. Moser, E.B. (2004) Repeated measures modeling with Proc Mixed. Proceed- ings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Paper 188-29. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  13. Oliver, C.D. & Larson, B.C. (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics, Update edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  14. Rooney, T.P. & Dress, W.J. (1997) Species loss over sixty-six years in the ground-layer vegetation of Heart's Content, an old-growth forest in Pennsyl- vania USA. Natural Areas Journal, 17, 297-305.
  15. Royo, A.A. & Carson, W.P. (2006) On the formation of dense understory lay- ers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1345-1362.
  16. Russell, F.L., Zippin, D.B. & Fowler, N.L. (2001) Effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoilus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. The American Midland Naturalist, 146, 1-26.
  17. Tilghman, N.G. (1989) Impacts of white-tailed deer on forest regeneration in Northwestern Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 524-532.
  18. Tremblay, J.P., Huot, J. & Potvin, F. (2007) Density-related effects of deer browsing on the regeneration dynamics of boreal forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 552-562.
  19. Waller, D.M. & Alverson, W.S. (1997) The white-tailed deer: a keystone spe- cies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 217-226.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuttle, T., Ristau, T. E., & Royo, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Ecological Services Division 333 Baldwind Road Pittsburgh PA 15205 USA
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Nuttle, Tim
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-05
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
221-228
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2128336815
Cited by
177
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1120579)
  • Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
deer density, ungulate browsing, biological legacies, white-tailed deer, long-term vegetation change, forest regeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review