Long‐term biological legacies of herbivore density in a landscape‐scale experiment: forest understoreys reflect past deer density treatments for at least 20 years
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Ungulate browsers, when at high densities, are major drivers of vegetation change in forests world‐wide. Their effects operate via a variety of generalizable mechanisms related to plant palatability and relative growth rate with respect to browsing pressure. Though such impacts are obviously long‐lasting when they determine composition of tree regeneration, we document in a unique long‐term (30 year) experiment that biological legacies of initial deer density persist in the understorey herbaceous vegetation at least 20 years after deer densities were equalized. We sampled understorey vegetation in former clear‐cut areas where density of white‐tailed deer (O docoileus virginianus) was manipulated (3.9–31.2 deer km−2) for 10 years (1979–1990), and stands experienced ambient deer density (ca. 10–12 deer km−2) for the next 20 years (1990–2010) to determine whether initial deer density treatments still influenced understorey vegetation in 30‐year‐old, closed‐canopy forests. Stands initially (1979–1990) exposed to higher deer densities had ca. five times higher fern cover and three times the seedling and forb cover in 2010, as well as significantly lower angiosperm species density, compared to stands initially exposed to lower deer densities. These results appear driven by deer avoidance of ferns, allowing them to expand at high deer density and sequester sites for decades. Synthesis. Our long‐term, experimental results show unequivocally that elevated deer densities cause significant, profound legacy effects on understorey vegetation persisting at least 20 years. Of relevance regionally and globally where high deer densities have created depauperate understoreys, we expect that deer density reduction alone does not guarantee understorey recovery; stands may need to be managed by removing recalcitrant understorey layers (e.g. ferns).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The impacts of chronic excessive browse accumulate, creating legacy effects that persist for decades.
“The impacts of chronic excessive browse also accumulate, creating legacy effects that persist for decades (Nuttle et al., 2014;Tanentzap et al., 2012;Webster et al., 2005).”
From Overabundant deer and invasive plants drive widespread regeneration debt in eastern United States national parks (2023) · cites this paper as Nuttle et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Royo, A. A., Stout, S. L., deCalesta, D. S., & Pierson, T. G. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.020 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Baines, D., Sage, R.B. & Baines, M.M. (1994) The implications of red deer grazing to ground vegetation and invertebrate communities of Scottish native pinewoods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 776-783.
- Balgooyen, C.P. & Waller, D.M. (1995) The use of Clintonia borealis and other indicators to gauge impacts of white-tailed deer on plant communities in northern Wisconsin, USA. Natural Areas Journal, 15, 308-318.
- Cardinal, E., Martin, J.-L., Tremblay, J.-P. & Côt e, S.D. (2012) An experimen- tal study of how variation in deer density affects vegetation and songbird assemblages of recently harvested boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Zool- ogy, 90, 704-713.
- Carson, W.P., Carson, J.A., Royo, A.A. & Kirschbaum, C. (2005) Plant com- munities growing on boulders in the Allegheny National Forest: evidence for boulders as refugia from deer and as a bioassay of overbrowsing. Natural Areas Journal, 25, 10-18.
- Côte, S.D., Rooney, T.P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C. & Waller, D.M. (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 35, 113-147.
- Engelman, H.M. & Nyland, R.D. (2006) Interference to hardwood regeneration in Northeastern North America: assessing and countering fern interference. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 23, 166-175.
- Hill, J.D. & Silander, J.J.A. (2001) Distribution and dynamics of two ferns: Dennstaedtia punctilobula (Dennstaedtiaceae) and Thelypteris noveboracensis (Thelypteridaceae) in a Northeast mixed hardwoods-hemlock forest. Ameri- can Journal of Botany, 88, 894-902.
- Horsley, S.B. & Marquis, D.A. (1983) Interference by weeds and deer with Allegheny Pennsylvania U.S.A. hardwood reproduction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 61-69.
- Littell, R.C., Pendergast, J. & Natarajan, R. (2004) Modelling covariance struc- ture in the analysis of repeated measures data. Tutorial in Biostatistics Vol- ume 2: Statistical Modeling of Complex Medical Data (ed. R.B. D'Agostino), pp. 159-185.
- Lutz, H.J. (1930) Original forest composition in northwestern Pennsylvania as indicated by early land survey notes. Journal of Forestry, 28, 1098- 1103.
- McShea, W.J., Underwood, H.B. & Rappole, J.H. (1997) The Science of Over- abundance: Deer Ecology and Population Management. Smithsonian Institu- tion Press, Washington, DC.
- Moser, E.B. (2004) Repeated measures modeling with Proc Mixed. Proceed- ings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Paper 188-29. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
- Oliver, C.D. & Larson, B.C. (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics, Update edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
- Rooney, T.P. & Dress, W.J. (1997) Species loss over sixty-six years in the ground-layer vegetation of Heart's Content, an old-growth forest in Pennsyl- vania USA. Natural Areas Journal, 17, 297-305.
- Royo, A.A. & Carson, W.P. (2006) On the formation of dense understory lay- ers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1345-1362.
- Russell, F.L., Zippin, D.B. & Fowler, N.L. (2001) Effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoilus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. The American Midland Naturalist, 146, 1-26.
- Tilghman, N.G. (1989) Impacts of white-tailed deer on forest regeneration in Northwestern Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 524-532.
- Tremblay, J.P., Huot, J. & Potvin, F. (2007) Density-related effects of deer browsing on the regeneration dynamics of boreal forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 552-562.
- Waller, D.M. & Alverson, W.S. (1997) The white-tailed deer: a keystone spe- cies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 217-226.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Russell, M. B., Woodall, C. W., Potter, K. M., Walters, B. F., Domke, G. M., & Oswalt, C. M. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.038 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Impacts of white-tailed deer on regional patterns of forest tree recruitment
Bradshaw, L., & Waller, D. M. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.019 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Miller, K. M., Perles, S. J., Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., Weed, A. S., Comiskey, J. A., Marshall, M. R., Nelson, P., & Fisichelli, N. A. (2023) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2837 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., & Brolis, A. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118015 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nuttle, T., Ristau, T. E., & Royo, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Ecological Services Division 333 Baldwind Road Pittsburgh PA 15205 USA
- US Forest Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nuttle, Tim
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-228
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2128336815
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 11.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1120579)
- Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- deer density, ungulate browsing, biological legacies, white-tailed deer, long-term vegetation change, forest regeneration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review