Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies along a 2‐million‐year dune chronosequence

Open access
Hayes, Patrick, Turner, Benjamin L., Lambers, Hans, Laliberté, Etienne·2014·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Long‐term pedogenesis leads to important changes in the availability of soil nutrients, especially nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Changes in the availability of micronutrients can also occur, but are less well understood. We explored whether changes in leaf nutrient concentrations and resorption were consistent with a shift from N to P limitation of plant productivity with soil age along a > 2‐million‐year dune chronosequence in south‐western Australia. We also compared these traits among plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies, focusing on N, P and micronutrients. The range in leaf [P] for individual species along the chronosequence was exceptionally large for both green (103–3000 μg P g−1) and senesced (19–5600 μg P g−1) leaves, almost equalling that found globally. From the youngest to the oldest soil, cover‐weighted mean leaf [P] declined from 1840 to 228 μg P g−1, while P‐resorption efficiency increased from 0% to 79%. All species converged towards a highly conservative P‐use strategy on the oldest soils. Declines in cover‐weighted mean leaf [N] with soil age were less strong than for leaf [P], ranging from 13.4 mg N g−1 on the youngest soil to 9.5 mg N g−1 on the oldest soil. However, mean leaf N‐resorption efficiency was greatest (45%) on the youngest, N‐poor soils. Leaf N:P ratio increased from 8 on the youngest soil to 42 on the oldest soil. Leaf zinc (Z n) concentrations were low across all chronosequence stages, but mean Z n‐resorption efficiency was greatest (55–74%) on the youngest calcareous dunes, reflecting low Z n availability at high p H. N2‐fixing species had high leaf [N] compared with other species. Non‐mycorrhizal species had very low leaf [P] and accumulated M n across all soils. We surmise that this reflects M n solubilization by organic acids released for P acquisition. Synthesis. Our results show community‐wide variation in leaf nutrient concentrations and resorption that is consistent with a shift from N to P limitation during long‐term ecosystem development. High Z n resorption on young calcareous dunes supports the possibility of micronutrient co‐limitation. High leaf [M n] on older dunes suggests the importance of carboxylate release for P acquisition. Our results show a strong effect of soil nutrient availability on nutrient‐use efficiency and reveal considerable differences among plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2745.12196

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, P., Turner, B. L., Lambers, H., & Laliberté, E.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-10
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
396-410
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2140252621
Cited by
316
References
62
FWCI
22.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies along a 2‐million‐year dune chronosequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1365-2745.12196
The paper
Hayes, P., Turner, B. L., Lambers, H., & Laliberté, E. (2014). Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies along a 2‐million‐year dune chronosequence. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12196

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.