The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia
Abstract
Summary: In the tropical rainforest of Amazonia, phosphorus (P) is one of the main nutrients controlling forest dynamics, but its effects on the future of the forest biomass carbon (C) storage under elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations remain uncertain. Soils in vast areas of Amazonia are P‐impoverished, and little is known about the variation or plasticity in plant P‐use and ‐acquisition strategies across space and time, hampering the accuracy of projections in vegetation models. Here, we synthesize current knowledge of leaf P resorption, fine‐root P foraging, arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses, and root acid phosphatase and organic acid exudation and discuss how these strategies vary with soil P concentrations and in response to elevated atmospheric CO 2 . We identify knowledge gaps and suggest ways forward to fill those gaps. Additionally, we propose a conceptual framework for the variations in plant P‐use and ‐acquisition strategies along soil P gradients of Amazonia. We suggest that in soils with intermediate to high P concentrations, at the plant community level, investments are primarily directed to P foraging strategies via roots and arbuscular mycorrhizas, whereas in soils with intermediate to low P concentrations, investments shift to prioritize leaf P resorption and mining strategies via phosphatases and organic acids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The best soil variable in our model is soil phosphorus, a known limiting factor for Amazonian biomass productivity favoring better agricultural potential, higher near the Andes and lower in central and eastern Amazonia (Reichert et al., 2022).”
From Predicting the geographic distribution of ancient amazonian archaeological sites with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as Reichert et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles
Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T., & Delong, E. F. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153213 · Cited by 3,379
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 210
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11258-019-00986-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.09.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01458.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s005720000081 · DOI
- 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00043 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-14225-3_12 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0123796 · DOI
- 10.1590/S0100-06832003000600004 · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00026 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-020-01505-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021-012-9575-6 · DOI
- 10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1146-609X(97)80027-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.019 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aba3756 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02370885 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.0031 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14283 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/nph.14976 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2017.01834 · DOI
- 10.1002/ece3.7036 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.12618 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.011 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00883.x · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2019.00157 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01043.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1302768110 · DOI
- 10.1890/09-1582.1 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1218042110 · DOI
- 10.1002/pei3.10010 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.15151 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118951446.ch14 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2019.00664 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0266467400003199 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.08.018 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbo.1996.0320 · DOI
- 10.1007/3-540-26609-7_9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142434 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01248 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0086246 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.14413 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0470:FLPCAD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.17072 · DOI
- 10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0163-0463 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.018 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-021-05132-3 · DOI
- 10.1002/jpln.201400590 · DOI
- 10.3390/plants4020253 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011GB004082 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-10-3745-2017 · DOI
- 10.1002/ecy.3090 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02438.x · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.12196 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13904 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01805.x · DOI
- 10.1071/FP05043 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01015.x · DOI
- 10.3389/feart.2016.00019 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01821.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0047128 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2035-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00010-X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01077.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107628 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.17081 · DOI
- 10.1111/gcb.15277 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2128-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.019 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcv088 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1004356007312 · DOI
- 10.2307/1937148 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-08216-5_2 · DOI
- 10.2307/2265777 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012520915-1/50017-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-013-1624-1 · DOI
- 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00159 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11258-013-0215-9 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.257.5077.1672 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.12562 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-017-3234-9 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev‐arplant‐102720‐125738 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/aob/mcl114 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-020-04690-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00333225 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13434 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-012631260-7/50010-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-019-03963-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.17154 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1013324727040 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-8435-5_5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02068.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03967.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-021-05148-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.12190 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13363 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2019.01215 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7061(81)90024-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)31209-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-008-9670-9 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1999.0524 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02721.x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-15271-9_9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-017-1245-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/ele.12335 · DOI
- 10.1002/ecy.2646 · DOI
- 10.1038/372666a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/geb.12062 · DOI
- 10.1002/jpln.200520558 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-017-3212-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12229-014-9149-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13175 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0485:EONAPA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1164033 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01495.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s13595-010-0005-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.12758 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01279.x · DOI
- 10.5194/bg-7-1515-2010 · DOI
- 10.5194/bg-8-1415-2011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5194/bg-9-2203-2012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11104-015-2558-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14967 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.100161 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.13521 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.111.175448 · DOI
- 10.1890/04-0524 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00741.x · DOI
- 10.1111/btp.12297 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118951446.ch12 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-92881-4_8 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-10613-2_8 · DOI
- 10.1080/00380768.2014.993298 · DOI
- Sayer EJ, 2020, Advances in Ecological Research, 173
- 10.1038/s41396-018-0189-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00370.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01039.x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-020-58913-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.028 · DOI
- 10.2307/1936571 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2435.12325 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00572-014-0556-9 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2019.01658 · DOI
- Tabatabai MA, 1994, Soil enzymes, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Microbiological and Biochemical Properties, 5, 775
- 10.1093/jpe/rtt013 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aba1223 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03306-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaf4610 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.021 · DOI
- 10.5194/gmd-12-4781-2019 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0525 · DOI
- 10.1139/b96-233 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01159.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-013-1681-5 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00470.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0946:EOSNAO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001063.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00442-017-3938-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01384.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nature25789 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-013-1750-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-012-1493-z · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2745.13442 · DOI
- 10.1111/1365-2435.12424 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14571 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-016-2820-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00068-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x · DOI
- 10.1086/283931 · DOI
- 10.2307/1939481 · DOI
- 10.1007/s100219900033 · DOI
- 10.1890/08-0127.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.16866 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7061(76)90066-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.024 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.03.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molp.2017.07.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-019-03972-8 · DOI
- 10.2134/jeq2004.0423 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00374-010-0464-x · DOI
- 10.1890/14-1362.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-017-3431-6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1010367501363 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02157.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11104-017-3225-x · DOI
200 of 210 shown
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Walker, R. S., Ferguson, J. R., Olmeda, A., Hamilton, M. J., Elghammer, J., & Buchanan, B. (2023) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.15137 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., & Fleischer, K.
- Affiliations
- School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising 85354 Germany
- Centre of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science University of Vienna Vienna 1090 Austria
- National Institute of Amazonian Research Manaus 69060‐062 Brazil
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-02-24
- Volume
- 234
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1126-1143
- ISSN
- 0028-646X
- 1469-8137
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- International Graduate School of Science and Engineering
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RA2060/5‐1)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (2649/2014)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/LBA 68/2013)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review