Cited by 77Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Effects of biological legacies and herbivory on fuels and flammability traits: A long‐term experimental study of alternative stable states

Open access
Blackhall, Melisa, Raffaele, Estela, Paritsis, Juan, Tiribelli, Florencia, Morales, Juan M., Kitzberger, Thomas, Gowda, Juan H., Veblen, Thomas T.·2017·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Ecological memory, often determined by the extent and type of retained biological legacies present following disturbance, may produce persistent landscape patterns. However, after fire, the persistence or switch to an alternative state may depend on the complex interplay of ecological memory (biological legacies) and potential effects of new external factors influencing the post‐fire environment. The current study assesses both the strength of ecological memory resulting from biological legacies of pre‐burn vegetation types as well as post‐fire effects of livestock. Following a severe fire in 1999, we set up a network of long‐term exclosures to examine the effects of legacies and cumulative herbivory by cattle on fuel types, amounts, distribution, flammability and microenvironmental conditions in two post‐fire communities representing alternative fire‐driven states: pyrophobic Nothofagus pumilio subalpine forests and pyrophytic Nothofagus antarctica tall shrublands in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Our results show that the retained post‐disturbance legacies of tall shrublands and subalpine forests largely determine fuel and flammability traits of the post‐fire plant communities 16 years after fire. The importance of biological legacies retained from the unburned plant communities was reflected by the substantially higher amounts of total fine fuel, greater vertical and horizontal fuel continuity and the higher temperatures reached during experimental tissue combustion at post‐fire shrubland compared to post‐fire forest sites. We show that herbivores may produce antagonistic effects on flammability by decreasing tissue ignitability, total fine fuel and litter depth, and disrupting the vertical and horizontal fine fuel continuity, therefore reducing the probability of fire propagation. However, cattle can increase ratios of dead to live fine fuels, reduce soil moisture, and inhibit tree height growth to canopy size, consequently impeding the development of a closed pyrophobic forest canopy. Synthesis. Our results support the hypothesis that biological legacies, most importantly the dominance by pyrophytic woody plants that resprout vigorously vs. the dominance by pyrophobic obligate seeders, favour fuel and flammability characteristics at the community level which reinforce the mechanisms maintaining pyrophytic shrublands vs. pyrophobic forests. Herbivory by introduced cattle can partially blur sharp pyrophobic/pyrophytic state boundaries by promoting the development of novel post‐fire transitional states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1365-2745.12796

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predicting future post-fire vegetation composition is difficult because landscape fragmentation, changing climate, non-native species, herbivory, variable propagule availability and interacting disturbances can alter successional trajectories from those in the past.

    “Predicting future post-fire vegetation composition is difficult because landscape fragmentation, changing climate, non-native species, herbivory, variable propagule availability and interacting disturbances can alter successional trajectories from those in the past (Batllori et al., 2018;Blackhall et al., 2017).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Blackhall et al., 2017

  • Herbivory interacts with fire activity.

    “It is also clear that herbivory interacts with fire activity (Blackhall et al., 2017;Fuhlendorf, Engle, Kerby, & Hamilton, 2009).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Blackhall et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers

    McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works

    “…post-fire vegetation composition is difficult because landscape fragmentation, changing climate, non-native species, herbivory, variable propagule availability and interacting disturbances can alter successional trajectories from those in the past (Batllori et al., 2018; Blackhall et al., 2017).”
    Self-citation

Authors
Blackhall, M., Raffaele, E., Paritsis, J., Tiribelli, F., Morales, J. M., Kitzberger, T., Gowda, J. H., & Veblen, T. T.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Blackhall, Melisa
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-22
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
1309-1322
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2606373131
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (112 201101 00058, 2012‐2371, 2012‐0949, 0956552, 0966472)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
biological legacies, ecological memory, herbivory, cattle grazing, fire regimes, fuel continuity, flammability, alternative stable states, post-fire vegetation, Nothofagus pumilio, Nothofagus antarctica, fire spread, soil moisture, litter depth, Patagonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review