Cited by 11Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionPoisoning and overdose treatmentsPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling to describe the effects of paracetamol and N‐acetylcysteine on the international normalized ratio

Open access
Owens, Katie H, Medlicott, Natalie J, Zacharias, Mathew, Whyte, Ian M, Buckley, Nicholas A, Reith, David M·2015·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

Summary: Paracetamol is one of the most common pharmaceutical agents taken in self‐poisonings, and can increase the prothrombin time (PT) through liver injury, and in overdose without hepatic injury by reducing functional factor VII. PT is a measure of hepatic injury used to predict and monitor hepatotoxicity, reported as the international normalized ratio (INR). The antidote for paracetamol poisoning, N‐acetylcysteine (NAC), has been reported to have an effect on the PT. This analysis included patients from a retrospective case series, a prospective inception cohort of paracetamol and psychotropic (control) overdoses, and a cross‐over clinical trial. A population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model describing the pharmacodynamic effects of paracetamol and NAC on the INR was developed in Phoenix NLME. The dataset included 172 patients; the median age was 22 years (range 13–71 years). A one‐compartment model with first‐order input and linear disposition best described paracetamol pharmacokinetics. The population mean estimate of the concentration that induced a response halfway between the baseline and maximal pharmacological effect of paracetamol was 1302 μ mol/L (242), the maximum effect of paracetamol was 0.534 (202; from baseline) and the maximum effect of NAC was 0.325 (9.03; from baseline). Both paracetamol and NAC contributed a pharmacological effect to the elevation of INR. The estimated paracetamol concentration that induced a response halfway between the baseline and maximal pharmacological effect was within the range of plasma paracetamol values studied, fivefold greater than the maximum therapeutic concentration, suggesting that an elevated INR would not be expected within the therapeutic range. Simulated 24 and 48 g paracetamol overdoses with NAC administration produced INR values (50th percentile) that reached the upper limit of, or exceeded, the reference range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1440-1681.12327

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Prescott L. Paracetamol (Acetaminophen). A Critical Bibliographic Review. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, 1996.
  2. van der Steeg J, Akhtar J, Burkhurt KK. Initial prothrombin time as a predictor of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. J. Clin. Toxi- col. 1995; 33: 508-9.
  3. van der Steeg J, Di Santo SK, Abendroth TW. The effect of acet- aminophen on the prothrombin assay. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 1995; 33: 512.
  4. Malia R, Kennedy B, Park D. The effect of acetaminophen on the vitamin K dependent prothrombin complex. Thromb. Haemost. 1985; 54: 205.
  5. Rumack BH, Toll LL, Gelman CR. POISINDEX(R) System. MI- CROMEDEX, Inc., Englewood, Colorado, 1999 (Edition expires 31 March 1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, K. H., Medlicott, N. J., Zacharias, M., Whyte, I. M., Buckley, N. A., & Reith, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ)
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Owens, Katie H
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-22
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
102-108
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W1976808864
Cited by
11
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
paracetamol, N-acetylcysteine, international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, acetaminophen overdose, acetaminophen toxicity, antidotes, hepatotoxicity, factor VII, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, self-poisoning
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Acetylcysteine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Cross-Over Studies, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, International Normalized Ratio, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review