Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilizing virtual reality for gender-affirming voice training: surveying the attitudes and perspectives of potential consumers

Smith, Charlotte, Gregory, Cath, Bryant, Lucy·2024·International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Abstract

Background: Undertaking voice and communication training is an important part of the gender‐affirming journey for many trans, gender‐diverse and non‐binary individuals. Training supports the alignment of voice with gender identity helping to reduce gender dysphoria as individuals are better able to connect with their voices. However, for training to be effective, regular practice is needed and the demands of training can often be difficult to meet. Aims: To investigate the interest, attitudes and perspectives on the use of immersive virtual reality (VR) to support gender‐affirming voice and communication training by transgender, gender non‐binary and gender‐diverse people, and speech–language pathologists providing gender‐affirming voice and communication training. Methods & Procedures: A mixed‐methods survey (i.e., collecting quantitative data through multiple‐choice question and qualitative data through free text questions) was hosted online from 23 August to 21 September 2021. A total of 17 questions asked about technology use, and attitudes and perspectives towards VR. The survey included video examples of three different voice‐activated VR applications to prompt participant responses about the technology. Outcomes & Results: A total of 70 survey responses were included in the analysis. All participants had previous experience using smart phones, but only 27.2% had previously used VR. Four key themes were identified relating to potential uptake of VR in gender‐affirming voice and communication training: (1) general audience appeal, (2) perceived therapeutic value, (3) exposure to or protection from harm and (4) relatability to real life. Conclusions & Implications: VR games may represent a viable option to support practice of voice exercises. Gamification through VR is likely to motivate some to increase frequency of practice. VR applications that are used in voice training need to be fit‐for‐purpose, and detailed co‐design is necessary to build appropriate applications for future use. This study provides a foundation to inform the design, development and implementation of VR applications to be used in gender‐affirming voice training. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject?: Speech–language pathologists work closely with transgender and gender‐diverse individuals to help them achieve gender congruent voice and communication. Clients need to undertake regular and ongoing practice outside of training sessions to achieve and maintain their ideal voice. Motivation and adherence to regular practice sessions remain an ongoing challenge. What this study adds to the existing knowledge: This study explores the use of immersive VR technologies to create safe, motivating and enjoyable environments to encourage regular practice of gender‐affirming voice and communication exercises. It engages stakeholders in an early‐stage participant‐involved design to gauge interest in, and perspectives on, VR and technology‐based training support tools. The results suggest that voice‐activated VR applications would highly motivate some individuals if they were appropriately designed but would not be ideal for all. What are the actual and clinical implications of this work?: Immersion in VR can be a highly motivating tool to enhance adherence to practice schedules for some individuals. However, tools need to be specifically designed with outcomes in mind to be fit‐for‐purpose, to support individual goals and to minimize the risk of harm. The few existing VR voice‐activated applications that are available require further assessment, and redesign through co‐design with users to functionally and safely support gender‐affirming voice and communication training.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1460-6984.12968

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1080/02687038.2018.1431831 · DOI
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013)Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Available from:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.2196/11973 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2196/26344 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/17483107.2018.1549276 · DOI
  7. Bryant L. Helmsley B. Bailey B. Bluff A. Nguyen V. Stubbs P. Barnett D. Jacobs C. Lucas C.&Power E.(2020b)Opportunities for immersive virtual reality in rehabilitation: focus on communication disability:Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Maui HW 7 Jan. Available from:https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.437 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/17483107.2022.2063423 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.02.003 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00405‐016‐4420‐8 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa040.006 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/15532739.2015.1075931 · DOI
  13. 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1097/01.TLD.0000285360.18298.86 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1460‐6984.2012.00185.x · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.009 · DOI
  17. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR‐19‐00387 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/15532739.2018.1453425 · DOI
  19. Kanstrup A.M., 2017, Participatory design & health information technology
  20. Laver K.E., 2017, Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation, Cochrane Library, 11
  21. 10.1007/s10484‐006‐9005‐7 · DOI
  22. 10.1089/trgh.2019.0011 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0194599817712678 · DOI
  24. 10.1044/2020_AJSLP‐19‐00188 · DOI
  25. 10.1108/JET‐10‐2018‐0050 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.033 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/lary.3054 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/ap.12088 · DOI
  29. 10.1044/2019_PERSP‐19‐00034 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216288 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/09638288.2021.1895333 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.009 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.05.006 · DOI
  34. 10.4135/9781473957893 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Smith, C., Gregory, C., & Bryant, L.
Affiliations
Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney Graduate School of Health Sydney NSW Australia
Venue
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-11-06
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
976-990
ISSN
  • 1368-2822
  • 1460-6984
Cited by
11
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review