Cited by 211Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Virtual reality as a therapeutic modality for children with cerebral palsy

Snider, Laurie, Majnemer, Annette, Darsaklis, Vasiliki·2010·Developmental Neurorehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The evidence for using virtual reality (VR) with children with cerebral palsy (CP) was examined. METHODS: A search of 13 electronic databases identified all types of studies examining VR as an intervention for children with CP. The most recent article included was published in October 2008. For each study, the quality of the methods was assessed using the appropriate scale. A total of 19 articles were retrieved. Thirteen studies from 11 articles were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: Outcomes documented brain reorganization/plasticity, motor capacity, visual-perceptual skills, social participation and personal factors. Two studies were randomized controlled trials. These reported conflicting results regarding motor outcomes. Twelve of the 13 studies presented positive outcomes in at least one domain. CONCLUSIONS: VR has potential benefits for children with CP. However, the current level of evidence is poor and empirical data is lacking. Future methodologically rigorous studies are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17518420903357753

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of virtual reality use by children with cerebral palsy, which included motor but not postural control outcomes, concluded that substantial benefits could be gained from using virtual reality, but current evidence is weak.

    “A review of virtual reality use by children with CP, which included motor but not postural control outcomes, agrees that substantial benefits could be gained from using virtual reality; however, the current evidence is weak. 66”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snider, L., Majnemer, A., & Darsaklis, V.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Snider, Laurie
Venue
Developmental Neurorehabilitation
Published
2010-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
120-128
ISSN
  • 1363-8491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8423
  • 1751-8431
OpenAlex
W2068620558
Cited by
211
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University Health Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual reality, cerebral palsy, children, motor capacity, neuroplasticity, visual perceptual skills, social participation (health and rehabilitation), rehabilitation, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Brain, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Computer Simulation, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Motor Skills, Neuronal Plasticity, Self Concept, Social Behavior, User-Computer Interface, Visual Perception, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review