Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A universal measure of chaotropicity and kosmotropicity

Cray, Jonathan A., Russell, John T., Timson, David J., Singhal, Rekha S., Hallsworth, John E.·2013·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Diverse parameters, including chaotropicity, can limit the function of cellular systems and thereby determine the extent of E arth's biosphere. Whereas parameters such as temperature, hydrophobicity, pressure, pH , H ofmeister effects, and water activity can be quantified via standard scales of measurement, the chao‐/kosmotropic activities of environmentally ubiquitous substances have no widely accepted, universal scale. We developed an assay to determine and quantify chao‐/kosmotropicity for 97 chemically diverse substances that can be universally applied to all solutes. This scale is numerically continuous for the solutes assayed (from +361 kJ kg −1 mol −1 for chaotropes to −659 kJ kg −1 mol −1 for kosmotropes) but there are key points that delineate (i) chaotropic from kosmotropic substances (i.e. chaotropes ≥ +4; kosmotropes ≤ −4 kJ kg −1 mol −1 ); and (ii) chaotropic solutes that are readily water‐soluble (log P < 1.9) from hydrophobic substances that exert their chaotropic activity, by proxy , from within the hydrophobic domains of macromolecular systems (log P > 1.9). Examples of chao‐/kosmotropicity values are, for chaotropes: phenol +143, CaCl 2 +92.2, MgCl 2 +54.0, butanol +37.4, guanidine hydrochloride +31.9, urea +16.6, glycerol [> 6.5 M] +6.34, ethanol +5.93, fructose +4.56; for kosmotropes: proline −5.76, sucrose −6.92, dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) −9.72, mannitol −6.69, trehalose −10.6, NaCl −11.0, glycine −14.2, ammonium sulfate −66.9, polyethylene glycol‐ (PEG‐)1000 −126; and for relatively neutral solutes: methanol, +3.12, ethylene glycol +1.66, glucose +1.19, glycerol [< 5 M] +1.06, maltose −1.43 (kJ kg −1 mol −1 ). The data obtained correlate with solute interactions with, and structure–function changes in, enzymes and membranes. We discuss the implications for diverse fields including microbial ecology, biotechnology and astrobiology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1462-2920.12018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Cray, J. A., Russell, J. T., Timson, D. J., Singhal, R. S., & Hallsworth, J. E.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-12
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
287-296
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W1890027936
Cited by
208
References
1
FWCI
14.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A universal measure of chaotropicity and kosmotropicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12018
The paper
Cray, J. A., Russell, J. T., Timson, D. J., Singhal, R. S., & Hallsworth, J. E. (2013). A universal measure of chaotropicity and kosmotropicity. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.