The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root‐associated microbiome as a water stress‐dependent trait
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Although drought is an increasing problem in agriculture, the contribution of the root‐associated bacterial microbiome to plant adaptation to water stress is poorly studied. We investigated if the culturable bacterial microbiome associated with five grapevine rootstocks and the grapevine cultivar Barbera may enhance plant growth under drought stress. Eight isolates, over 510 strains, were tested in vivo for their capacity to support grapevine growth under water stress. The selected strains exhibited a vast array of plant growth promoting ( PGP ) traits, and confocal microscopy observation of gfp ‐labelled A cinetobacter and P seudomonas isolates showed their ability to adhere and colonize both the A rabidopsis and grapevine rhizoplane. Tests on pepper plants fertilized with the selected strains, under both optimal irrigation and drought conditions, showed that PGP activity was a stress‐dependent and not a per se feature of the strains. The isolates were capable of increasing shoot and leaf biomass, shoot length, and photosynthetic activity of drought‐challenged grapevines, with an enhanced effect in drought‐sensitive rootstock. Three isolates were further assayed for PGP capacity under outdoor conditions, exhibiting the ability to increase grapevine root biomass. Overall, the results indicate that PGP bacteria contribute to improve plant adaptation to drought through a water stress‐induced promotion ability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Cited by
A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application
Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004 · Cited by 1,643
Plant–Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions
Velásquez, A. C., Castroverde, C. D. M., & He, S. Y. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.054 · Cited by 970
The Plant Microbiota: Systems-Level Insights and Perspectives
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y., & Vorholt, J. A. (2016) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-034952 · Cited by 846
Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Herrera Paredes, S., Salas González, I., & Dangl, J. L. (2017) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2017.04.018 · Cited by 721
Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity
Xiong, C., Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Singh, B., Han, L., Shen, J., Li, P., Wang, G., Wu, C., Ge, A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16890 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Vigani, G., Ettoumi, B., Mapelli, F., Deangelis, M. L., Gandolfi, C., Casati, E., Previtali, F., Gerbino, R., Pierotti Cei, F., Borin, S., Sorlini, C., Zocchi, G., & Daffonchio, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-331
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1938979467
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root‐associated microbiome as a water stress‐dependent trait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1462-2920.12439
- The paper
- Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Vigani, G., Ettoumi, B., Mapelli, F., Deangelis, M. L., Gandolfi, C., Casati, E., Previtali, F., Gerbino, R., Pierotti Cei, F., Borin, S., Sorlini, C., Zocchi, G., & Daffonchio, D. (2015). Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root‐associated microbiome as a water stress‐dependent trait. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.