The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application
Open accessAbstract
Plants have evolved with a plethora of microorganisms having important roles for plant growth and health. A considerable amount of information is now available on the structure and dynamics of plant microbiota as well as on the functional capacities of isolated community members. Due to the interesting functional potential of plant microbiota as well as due to current challenges in crop production there is an urgent need to bring microbial innovations into practice. Different approaches for microbiome improvement exist. On the one hand microbial strains or strain combinations can be applied, however, field success is often variable and improvement is urgently required. Smart, knowledge-driven selection of microorganisms is needed as well as the use of suitable delivery approaches and formulations. On the other hand, farming practices or the plant genotype can influence plant microbiota and thus functioning. Therefore, selection of appropriate farming practices and plant breeding leading to improved plant-microbiome interactions are avenues to increase the benefit of plant microbiota. In conclusion, different avenues making use of a new generation of inoculants as well as the application of microbiome-based agro-management practices and improved plant lines could lead to a better use of the plant microbiome. This paper reviews the importance and functionalities of the bacterial plant microbiome and discusses challenges and concepts in regard to the application of plant-associated bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Passari, A. K., Mishra, V. K., Gupta, V. K., Yadav, M. K., Saikia, R., & Singh, B. P. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139468 · Cited by 186
RetractedDADA2: High–resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., & Holmes, S. P. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869 · Cited by 35,698
Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome
Fierer, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87 · Cited by 3,487
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice
Edwards, J., Johnson, C., Santos-Medellín, C., Lurie, E., Podishetty, N. K., Bhatnagar, S., Eisen, J. A., & Sundaresan, V. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414592112 · Cited by 2,856
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P., & Raaijmakers, J. M. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12028 · Cited by 2,820
Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria
Mendes, R., Kruijt, M., de Bruijn, I., Dekkers, E., van der Voort, M., Schneider, J. H. M., Piceno, Y. M., DeSantis, T. Z., Andersen, G. L., Bakker, P. A. H. M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203980 · Cited by 2,800
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Self-citationTop 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology
MANSFIELD, J., GENIN, S., MAGORI, S., CITOVSKY, V., SRIARIYANUM, M., RONALD, P., DOW, M., VERDIER, V., BEER, S. V., MACHADO, M. A., et al. (2012) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x · Cited by 2,409
Zhalnina, K., Louie, K. B., Hao, Z., Mansoori, N., da Rocha, U. N., Shi, S., Cho, H., Karaoz, U., Loqué, D., Bowen, B. P., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3 · Cited by 2,368
Cited by
From Microbiome to Traits: Designing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Improved Crop Resiliency
de Souza, R. S. C., Armanhi, J. S. L., & Arruda, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.01179 · Cited by 281
Rhizosphere microbial communities and heavy metals
Barra Caracciolo, A., & Terenzi, V. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9071462 · Cited by 234
The need for an integrated multi-OMICs approach in microbiome science in the food system
Ferrocino, I., Rantsiou, K., McClure, R., Kostic, T., de Souza, R. S. C., Lange, L., FitzGerald, J., Kriaa, A., Cotter, P., Maguin, E., et al. (2023) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.13103 · Cited by 110
Self-citationLane, J. M., Delavaux, C. S., Van Koppen, L., Lu, P., Cade-Menun, B. J., Tremblay, J., & Bainard, L. D. (2022) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108858 · Cited by 51
Khokhar, M. K., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Sehgal, M., Singh, S. P., Meena, P. N., Singh, N., Acharya, L. K., Birah, A., Singh, K., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1388754 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 29-37
- ISSN
- 2090-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-1232
- OpenAlex
- W2923759160
- Cited by
- 1,643
- References
- 107
- FWCI
- 105.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
- The paper
- Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A. (2019). A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
