Parenting advice for intercultural couples: a systemic perspective
Abstract
This article presents advice for intercultural parents, based on findings of a qualitative study that examined how intercultural parents negotiated their cultural differences. Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were conducted with fourteen intercultural heterosexual couples/parents in South East Queensland. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data and understand the meanings of participants’ experiences. The findings revealed that not only aspects of cultural background, but also systemic and contextual factors impacted on the experiences of intercultural parents. Advice for intercultural parents is described from three systemic perspectives: the individual sphere, the couple/parent sphere and the child's sphere. Practical implications for therapists and counsellors working with intercultural parents are discussed. Practitioner points Find value in cultural differences and similarities in parenting style to form a balanced view Explore benefits and opportunities of intercultural parenting as source of strength Use culture as a valuable source for change Assume the role of mediator and interpreter when dealing with conflicts in cultural code Practice cultural sensitivity and reflexivity Conflict may be due to processes other than culture, such as emotional processes. Explore power dynamics in parenting
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When intercultural couples fail to reconcile childrearing differences, children's development, parent-child relations, and couple relations are at higher risk of dysfunction.
“When intercultural couples fail to reconcile their childrearing differences, the development of children, parent-child relations, and couple relations are placed at a higher risk of dysfunction (Bhugun, 2017;Bustamante, Nelson, Richard C. Henriksen, & Monakes, 2011).”
From Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families (2017) · cites this paper as Bhugun, 2017
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parenting Stress and Social Support among Cross-national and Traditional Families
Xiang, Y., Hoot, J., & Raisor, J. (2017) · Journal of Family Diversity in Education · doi:10.53956/jfde.2017.103 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhugun, D.
- Affiliations
- Psycho‐social therapist/counsellor, Realistic counselling Gold Coast Australia
- Corresponding author
- Bhugun, Dharam
- Venue
- Journal of Family Therapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 454-477
- ISSN
- 0163-4445 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6427
- OpenAlex
- W2737559459
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- intercultural parenting, intercultural couples, cultural differences, parenting styles, systemic family therapy, cultural sensitivity, reflexivity, cultural conflict
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review