The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Entrepreneurial Intentions and Outcomes: a Comparative Causal Mapping Study
Abstract
This paper uses a causal map methodology to consider the contrasts between entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes. In evaluating a series of propositions drawn from the extant literature the study finds that the elicited causal maps are consistent with contrasts in entrepreneurial intentions, but not outcomes. This suggests that the existing emphasis on entrepreneurial strategies being deliberate, conscious processes may be misplaced: non‐deliberate, emergent strategies may be just as influential in producing entrepreneurial outcomes. The study develops a series of output propositions suggesting that entrepreneurial outcomes are associated with causal maps which connect the internal operations of the business with the external environment. This implies that entrepreneurial success may be a result of intuitive systems thinking in which connections are made between the environment and the internal operations of the business.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is evidence elsewhere that the owner's ability to connect an understanding of the external environment with internal operational aspects of the business makes a difference to outcomes (Jenkins and Johnson, 1997).”
From ‘Relationships Mean Everything’; A Typology of Small–Business Relationship Strategies in a Reflexive Context (2002) · cites this paper as Jenkins and Johnson, 1997
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The causes of food waste in the supplier–retailer interface: Evidences from the UK and Spain
Mena, C., Adenso-Diaz, B., & Yurt, O. (2011) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.006 · Cited by 473
Fuller, T., & Lewis, J. (2002) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00249 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, M., & Johnson, G.
- Affiliations
- Cranfield University (GB)
- ORCID
- Jenkins, Mark
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 895-920
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2134774748
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Keywords
- entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurial outcomes, causal maps, emergent strategy, deliberate strategy, systems thinking, intuition, entrepreneurial success
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review