The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment
Abstract
This paper explores the ability of firms to integrate a critical strategic issue, the natural environment, into the strategic planning process within the natural resource‐based perspective. Using survey data collected from a wide variety of firms and industries based in the United States, we empirically examined the antecedents and effects of integrating the natural environment into the formal planning process. These data were analysed using structural equation modelling with the LISREL technique. Overall, our data provided strong support for the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, we found that the level of integration of environmental management concerns in the strategic planning process was positively related to financial and environmental performance. Furthermore, we found that the greater the functional coverage and the more resources provided to environmental issues, the greater the integration of environmental issues in the planning process. These results suggest that concern for environmental issues may yield competitive advantages in the marketplace as the natural resource‐based perspective suggests
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Toward the development of a big data analytics capability
Gupta, M., & George, J. F. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.07.004 · Cited by 1,445
The Impact of Strategic Relevance and Assurance of Sustainability Indicators on Investors' Decisions
Cheng, M. M., Green, W. J., & Ko, J. C. W. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50738 · Cited by 317
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Lisi, I. E. (2015) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2015.06.001 · Cited by 225
Ren, S., Jiang, K., & Tang, G. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22079 · Cited by 180
Improving the Sustainable Development of Firms: The Role of Employees
Wolf, J. (2013) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1731 · Cited by 157
Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility
Heikkurinen, P. (2010) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.225 · Cited by 155
Organizations’ Management Configurations Towards Environment and Market Performances
Ren, S., Fan, D., & Tang, G. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05299-4 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-262
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W1993074742
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.