The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence
Abstract
Drawing a framework from stakeholder theory, this study uses 1994 data drawn from 100 United Kingdom listed companies to test empirically whether the level of discretionary donations made by companies to charitable, social and political causes is related to four company‐specific factors, namely leverage, company size, profitability and ownership structure. Consistent with our hypotheses, the results indicate that the decision to contribute funds to charities and other bodies is positively related to company size and profitability and negatively related to leverage. However, the study provides no support for the view that there is a link between discretionary donations and a company's ownership structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis
Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2005) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4 · Cited by 984
Doing good deeds in times of need: a strategic perspective on corporate disaster donations
Muller, A., & Kräussl, R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.917 · Cited by 385
Tian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2015.14 · Cited by 83
Yu, F., Shi, Y., & Wang, T. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120840 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, M., & Hardwick, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 641-654
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2039202651
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
